Acknowledges Fr.Leonard Feeney was not excommunicated for heresy and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 supported the priest from Boston.
Diocese Office of Communications does not comment.
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2011
BISHOP ROBERT FINN AND BISHOP RAYMOND BOLAND OF KANSAS CITY AFFIRMING THE CHURCH’S TEACHINGS ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ?
Diocese Director of Communications unsure.
Thursday, November 3, 2011
BISHOP EMERITUS RAYMOND J.BOLAND OF KANSAS CITY CORRESPONDS WITH FR.PETER SCOTT OF THE SSPX ON THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2011
DOMINUS IESUS AFFIRMS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________________________
SSPX ,CATHOLIC TRADITIONALISTS ARE ANATHEMA ACCORDING TO THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
NON CATHOLICS CAN BE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE, BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND IT DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS- Daphne McLeod, Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice, England
DAPHNE MCLEOD COMMENT A BOMBSHELL FOR ENGLISH BISHOPS?
ASSISI INTERFAITH MEETING OCT.27: OLD PROBLEM AMONG TRADITIONALISTS SURFACE
SSPX CONSIDERS THOSE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE AND WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AS DE FACTO KNOWN TO US : DISCERNING LIBERALS MUST BE LAUGHING UP THEIR SLEEVE
SSPX CONSIDERS THOSE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE AND WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AS EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS THIS IS HERESY
SSPX IN HERESY CALLS ATTENTION TO HERESY AT ASSISI
SSPX CLARIFY FOR US WHAT IS YOUR DOCTRINAL POSITION ON THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
ARCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE CALLED "TO PREACH" THE RIGORIST INTERPRETATION OF "EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS"
SSPX CLARIFY FOR US WHAT IS YOUR DOCTRINAL POSITION ON THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
NORMS FOR THE TRIDENTINE RITE MASS VIOLATED ?
Michael Voris Hits the Jackpot…that is, “the dogma”- Brother André Marie MICM :RealCatholicTV affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
CATHOLIC LAY PROFESSOR AT UNIVERSITA EUROPA DI ROMA AFFIRMS DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
LEGIONARY OF CHRIST PRIEST FR.RAFAEL PASCUAL AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE
FR.TULLIO ROTONDO AFFIRMS CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IS DE FIDE AND NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II- Fr. Nevus Marcello O.P
BRAZILIAN PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR CHRISTIAN UNITY INDICATES POPES, SAINTS IN HERESY
Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity claims Pope Pius XII condemned the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus :suggests those in invincible ignorance are explicitly known to us and so contradicts the dogma
Vatican website for clergy promotes 'theology of religions', Kung and Knitter : claims Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for the same interpretation of the dogma as the popes and saints
CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN ROME AGREE WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY: THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF
CATHOLIC HERALD, U.K: IS IT STILL CATHOLIC?
ANGELICUM UNIVERSITY IS CHURNING OUT THEOLOGY DEGREES FOR THOSE WHO SAY FR.LEONARD FEENEY WAS EXCOMMUNICATED FOR REJECTING THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE
Posts
4 comments:
How does the Assisi III scandal fit into the dogma?
The dogma says everyone needs to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation. Every one needs to be an explicit member of the Church and there are no exceptions. There are no known exceptions of someone saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire, the ‘seeds of the Word’, a good conscience etc.
So there are no exceptions at Assisi.
According to the teachings of the Catholic Church (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence, Vatican Council II LG 14, AG 7) all the non Catholic participants are oriented to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church.
So you adhere to the Fr. Feeney's teachings?
I believe the Bible, Fr.Leonard Feeney, the Church Fathers, popes and saints were saying that everyone needs to be an explicit member of the Catholic Church.
The dogma like Fr.Leonard Feeney does not mention any exception of the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance.
Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church does not say that we know of explicit cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance.
Through out the centuries the popes and Councils knew that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known only to God. They are de facto known only to God.They are always implicit for us. So they do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct in saying that every one with no exception needs to be a visible member of the Church and there are no known exceptions.
Post a Comment