Even theologian John Lamont who teaches theology in Sydney with the archdiocese approval did not notice it.(1)
Msgr. Fernando Ocariz an Opus Dei theologian and Fr. Jean-Michel Gleize an SSPX seminary professor of ecclesiology at Econe did not notice a key point in Vatican Council II. They just assumed that Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so does Pope Pius XII.
Based on their interchange and failed conclusion the theologian John Lamont has written an account but also assuming the irrational, that is, we can actually know people in Heaven and somehow they are exceptions to the dogma which says there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Knowing people saved in invincible ignorance and other cases in Heaven it was assumed by Gleize, Ocariz and Lamont meant there is no more exclusive salvation in the Church. There are known exceptions (LG 16) etc.
Even the ecclesiology professor at Econe like his counterparts at the Angelicum and Gregorian University in Rome holds the liberal version of the Council and that too based on an irrationality.-Lionel Andrades
Is recognizing the SSPX questioning the Council?
PREFECT OF THE SUPREME TRIBUNAL: CAN THERE BE AN ‘ECCLESIAL RUPTURE’ FOR NOT AFFIRMING ‘ A VISIBLE BAPTISM OF DESIRE’ AND A LIBERAL, IRRATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CATECHISM AND VATICAN COUNCIL II ?
ECCLESIA DEI’S ADVICE TO THE INSTITUTE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD IS SCARY
SSPX -DICI SAYS ECCLESIA DEI HAS ASKED THE INSTITUTE OF THE GOOD SHEPHARD TO FOLLOW THE CATECHISM
DOMINICAN, FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE IMMACULATE AND DIOCESAN PRIESTS NEGATE POPE BENEDICT’S OVERSIGHT AND THAT OF THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Bishop Charles Morerod O.P Oath of Fidelity: to dissent
Profession of Faith allows for dissent on ecclesiology and baptism