Friday, July 19, 2013

Catholics are now aware- the Magisterium has made a mistake

 oct6conferencebanquet3.jpg










Sedevacantists and traditionalists must be aware that the Magisterium, the Vatican Curia today has  broken with Tradition because of the Richard Cushing Error, which is a false premise, an irrationality which influences their theology.  Without this Cushing Error, the interpretation of the Curia would be that of the sedevacantists and traditionalists.
 
So in dialogue with Catholic apologists identify the Richard Cushing error and then ask the apologist to defend his position.

The aim is to get all sides to see that the lack of unity, the divisions in the Church are not there doctrinally and theologically, unless like the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Richard Cushing, one mixes up in principle and in fact statements, resulting in a theology which suggests that the dead saved in Heaven are physically visible to us.
 
The SSPX broke away from the Church over theological differences stemming from the changes it adopted with the Second Vatican Council of some 45 years ago. The Vatican is currently engaged in a process aimed at formally reuniting the group with the Catholic Church.-Gazetta del Sud, online.(1)

 
There are similar reports on Reuters  nd they could have been referring also to the sedevacantists.
 
It could read :
 
The CMRI,MHFM and other sedevacantists broke away from the Church over theological differences stemming from the changes it adopted with the Second Vatican Council of some 45 years ago. The Vatican is currently (not engaged) in a process aimed at formally reuniting the CMRI and MHFM with the Catholic Church. 
 
For those who understand how the Richard Cushing Error is widespread in the Church it could be said:
The  Vatican Curia broke away from the Church's Magisterium and Tradition which was Sacred and inspired by the Holy Spirit. They did so by using an irrational premise in the interpretation of Church documents from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, through Vatican Council II and to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.There is no process of formally re uniting the SSPX, CMRI and MHFM with the Vatican, by identifying the Richard Cushing Error.
Without the Richard Cushing Error the Church Magisterium today would have no theological differences with the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) or the sedevacantists over the traditional interpretation of other religions.
oct5icebreaker.jpg 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NEGATIVE CYCLE

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican assumes there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So they reject the traditional teaching on other religions, they reject the traditional teaching on ecumenism assuming there are known exceptions in Christian  communities in the present time, they could meet these exceptional cases and shake hands with them. They reject the concept of a Catholic State since they assume that there are known, explcit to them,non Catholics  saved in the present times and that these cases are visible and personally known.So the dogma is now obsolete.
 
For them Collegiality does not consider the literal interpretation of the dogma and the Primacy of the pope is questioned assuming that the Orthodox Christians are saved in general in their religion. This is how  Cardinal Walter Kaspar and other liberals interpret Vatican Council II. For them the Richard Cushing Error creates known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.  
POSITIVE CYCLE
If there are no known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, when we cannot see the dead in 2013, then the Catholic teaching on other religions is still traditional, the teaching on ecumenism knows no exceptions, there is a moral obligation to work for a Catholic State, there can only be the Primacy of the pope over the Orthodox Christians and Collegiality must accept the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The sedevacantists are making the same error as the Vatican Curia, they are using the Richard Cushing Error. For example here is the CMRI: 

The Second Vatican Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious liberty and false ecumenism. These were previously condemned by:
   Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)
   Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)
   Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)
   Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)
   Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)
THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals. 
 
Quanta Cura, Mystici Corporis and the Syllabus of Errors do not state that there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or that those saved with implicit desire etc are physically visible to us or that these are known cases in the present times.This is all assumed wrongly. This was the original mistake of Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits in Boston.The baptism of desire etc was never ever  relevant to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.The Vatican Curia is making the same mistake as the traditionalists and the sedevacantists.
-Lionel Andrades
Photos: CMRI Conference Banquet (CMRI website)
______________________________________________________

No comments: