There has been no response from Cristina Siccardi to e-mails which show there is a doctrinal error in her recent book being distributed by the SSPX, Italy.On p.133 of L'Inverno della Chiesa dopo il Concilio Vaticano II she has referred to outside the visible limits of the Church there being salvation (UR 3). For her UR 3 is a contradiction to the traditional teaching on salvation and other religions and Christian communities.
Fr.Gabriel who offered Mass last Sunday at the SSPX chapel in Rome has said that being saved in imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3) is a possibility but not a known exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Fr.Gabriel is aware that there are no known exceptions . Cristina Siccardi is not aware of it.
She has just accepted Fr.Jean Marie Glieze saying that Vatican Council II says outside the visible limits of the Catholic Church there are known cases of salvation. He assumed too that UR 3 is a known exception.
When Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said that there could be Hindu in Tibet saved in his religion he did not say that we know this case in the present times or that we could know this person. So he did not say that there was a known exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
We can accept that there could be a Hindu in Tibet saved in his religion and also simultaneously accept the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, whose text does not mention any exceptions, known or unknown.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment