Saturday, March 8, 2014

CANONICALLY HERESY

Feast of the Assumption_05It is not known if the Fischer More College intends to file a Canonical petition with Ecclesia Dei (1)

It is possible that Bishop Michael Olson may  defend himself saying  that the action was taken based on Summorum Pontificum which states that the Traditonal Latin Mass must be made available only for those who accept Vatican Council II. He could imply that  Mr. Michael King  and the faculty reject Vatican Council II and affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition. So he had a right to halt the Tridentine Rite Mass  being offered at FMC.
He does not oppose the TLM since he permits it in the rest of the diocese where the priests do not have the 'ideology' of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. 
 
It is important that the FMC faculty review these posts in their defence.(2)
 
The issue here is also heresy.
 
1.
REJECTING THE NICENE CREED

When one assumes that the baptism of desire is visible for us and not invisible for us then it is a contradiction of the Nicene Creed. When we pray 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin' , instead of meaning there is one known baptism, we are really saying there are three known to us baptisms. The Nicene Creed refers to the baptism of water.Three known baptisms would be the baptism of water, desire and blood.The baptism of desire and blood are known only to God. These persons are visible and known only to Him.
 
2.
REJECTION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
When one assumes that being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) or imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3) are visible to us in the flesh and that they are really not invisible and unknown for us, then it is a rejection of Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 16 etc). When we assume that LG 16, UR 3 etc contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus we are implying that there are known, visible to us exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
 
3.
REJECTION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
When we assume that all those who are saved through Jesus and the Church in their religion (CCC 846) are known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 (and CCC 846) 'all', need 'faith and baptism' for salvation, then we are rejecting the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II. This is also a heresy.
-Lionel Andrades

1.
http://www.cfnews.org/page88/files/img012.jpg


2.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/summorum-pontificum-does-not-say-if.html#links

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/bishop-michael-olson-wants-faculty-and.html#links
 
This is the Mass- does the priest use a false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/this-is-mass-does-priest-use-false.html#links
 
Bishop Michael Olson could be assuming that the TLM rejects the New Revelation in Vatican Council II with the visible dead premise
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/bishop-michael-olson-could-be-assuming.html#links
 
PRIESTS OFFERING EXTRAORDINARY FORM OF MASS IN ROME DO NOT MEET CONDITIONS OF UNIVERSAE ECCLESIAE : INSTRUCTIONS OF ECCLESIA DEI
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/06/priests-offering-extraordinary-form-of.html#links
 

No comments: