I’m afraid that we have an unfortunate state of affairs whereby one does have to, outwardly at least, in the Novus Ordo Church, obey the Second Vatican Council unconditionally.
Lionel:
There is a Vatican Council with an irrational premise used in the interpretation and there is one without it.
There is a Vatican Council II with a false premise which makes the Council ambigous and there is one without the premise and ambiguity.
There is a Vatican Council with an irrational premise used in the interpretation and there is one without it.
There is a Vatican Council II with a false premise which makes the Council ambigous and there is one without the premise and ambiguity.
There is a Vatican Council II which is in perfect agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and there is a Vatican Council II ( with the inference) which is a break with Tradition and the dogma on exclusive salvation.
Your PP was using one of the two interpretations.
When we speak about Vatican Council II ( without the inference of explicit exceptions) then the Council affirms Tradition.
When we speak about Vatican Council II ( without the inference of explicit exceptions) then the Council affirms Tradition.
Only if we do not use the inference is the Council traditional.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment