Fr.Massimiliano dei Gasparri F.I former Rector of the Church of the Annunziata Rome said that to interpret implicit faith ( baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc) as referring to de facto salvation in the present times in personal cases would be a heresy.The popes interpreted implicit faith he said not as de facto salvation. We cannot judge de facto who has the baptism of desire and so does not need the baptism of water and will be saved.
Fr.Marco Hausmann FSSP in Rome agrees with this Franciscans of the Immaculate priest. He says there are no exceptions in 2015 to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Father Pedro Luis de Huidobro, the chaplain of the University of the Sacred Cross(Santa Croce), the Opus Dei university in Rome, agreed there could be persons who have not had the Gospel preached to them and who are in invincible ignorance. These persons can be saved and we do not know any such case. So they are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.They are not explicit exceptions.
He said all need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation in the present times and there are no known exceptions.Invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and neither to Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II.
Fr.Stefano Visintin OSB, Dean of the Faculty of Theology at the Pontifical University St.Anselm, Rome also says there are no known exceptions.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are possibilities, he said, but are not known exceptions to the traditional teaching on salvation.
Yet the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) still assumes on its USA website 1 that the baptism of desire etc is an exception to the dogma. They will not admit that the Marchetti Letter made an objective mistake and Archbishop Lefebvre did not notice it.
)
I recently sent Fr.Francois Laisney a message through the SSPX USA office.Fr.Laisney has written a book Is Feeneyism Catholic ? 2 in which he assumes the baptism of desire refers to known cases in the present times.His new theology is based on this irrationality.It is the same with the liberals. It is heresy.
The Marchetti letter was in heresy aside from being irrational.
Fr.Laisney's book is being sold by the Angelus Press of the SSPX USA and is part of the religious formation of SSPX priests.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
2.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment