Thursday, January 22, 2015

Steve Jalsevac says there is a collapse of religious leadership : yet he projects the Catholic Church as teaching heresy which Lifesites approves








 
Steve Jalsevac, is the co-founder of Lifesites.com along with John Henry Weston and neither of them are affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in agreement with Vatican Council II.This is similar to Steve Ertlet and the Catholic members of LifeNews.com.LifeNews and LifeSites take up Catholic issues and have a Catholic readership in which they are pro life and anti-abortion,as if these issues  are important from a traditional Catholic perspective.

 Yet they will not report on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as being in agreement with Vatican Council II.They are silent here.Since they do not want their business affected.
 
Steve Jalsevac says on Mic'd up that there is a collapse of religious  beliefs and there are no common standards any more.There is a rejection of reason. There is a collapse of leadership from the religious , including the Catholic Church.
Yet Lifesites.com promotes modernism and does not say that the Catholic teaching is still outside the Church there is no salvation and Protestants and others are outside the Church , including Steve Jalsevac and Steve Ertelt .
 
Lifesites reported on the Franciscans of the Immaculate having to accept Vatican Council II.As I mentioned in a previous post two important points related to Catholic doctrine were omitted. They are still not being addressed.

1.The F.I are expected to state that they affirm the Marchetti Letter (1949) in which it is assumed that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, refer to known cases in the present times and these persons are known exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma by Fr.Leonard Feeney.

2.Then they are expected to use the same irrational reasoning in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Lumen Gentium 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) they must affirm refers to known cases in the present times.They would have to be known to become exceptions. Since they are known in 2015 Vatican Council II becomes a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.This is irrational since these persons would be in Heaven. 

Lifesites has not denied that they have ignored these two important points.How could they ? They project the same irrationality as being Catholic. They contribute to the confusion in the Catholic Church.

Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14) says all need faith and baptism for salvation.It is in agreement with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, defined by three Church Councils and which Pope Pius XII called an 'infallible teaching'. This means the Catholic Church, in its official documents, states, as it did over centuries, that all non -Catholics, Protestants included, need to formally convert into the Catholic Church (with faith and baptism) to avoid the fires of Hell ( for salvation).

This is the teaching of the Catholic Church which Steven Jalsevec, Hilary White and John Henry Weston cannot proclaim through Life Sites since it is politically incorrect with the Left and their business could be targeted and careers ended, among other things.So it is convenient and comfortable for them to project Catholic issues while avoiding the teaching of the Church on salvation.

If John Henry Weston can do away with the dogma on exclusive salvation why is Lifesites critical of Catholics who do not want to follow the teachings on pro life issues?

If for social and personal reasons LifeSites does not want to talk about extra ecclesiam nulla salus being in agreement with Vatican Council II why complain when a mother aborts her child for social reasons?

Now if Vatican Council II is interpreted without this irrationality, for the Franciscans of the Immaculate and John Henry Weston, the Council would be in agreement with the 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney. Can LifeSites support the 'rigorist interpretation' of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Vatican Council II (AG 7) ?

So while rank and file Catholics know that there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the centuries old interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation, Life Sites like the liberals in the Vatican, project Vatican Council II as a break with the past. -Lionel Andrades 

Church teaching which Steven Ertelt, Hilary White,John Henry Weston and others cannot proclaim through LifeNews/Life Sites : not good for business
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/church-teaching-which-steven-ertelt.html

Protestant LifeSites.com ignores Pope Francis' comment on 'absurd' to look for Jesus without the Church


 

No comments: