Fr. Jurgen Wegner is the District Superior of the SSPX (USA) and Fr. Pierre Duverger, District Secretary of Communications and they are both not answering the TWO QUESTIONS which I have asked them.Perhaps since they want to protect their new seminary and other property.They do not want to be considered anti-Semitic by supporting Feeneyism.So they will affirm the Marchetti error and protect their interests.
TWO QUESTIONS
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2015 ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible for us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
If Fr. Jurgen Wegner's answer is :
1) No we do not know any case of the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience etc and we cannot physically see them in 2015 and 2) since they are not known; not visible to us they are not explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II - then they are rational.
He would be saying that there are no known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2015.Defacto, objectively, they would not know of any such case.If there was any such case (not exception ), it would only be known to God.If there was such a case of someone saved, or going to be saved, without the baptism of water, it would be a possibility known only to God and unknown to us human beings.Possibilities are not exceptions. Hypothetical cases cannot be defacto exceptions in the present times.
Then he would be saying of course that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake when it alleges that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the historical interpretation of the dogma, the 'rigorist interpretation'.
He would be contradiciting the SSPX position on Feeneyism.He would have to acknowledge that this is an error on the SSPX website and the book written by Fr.Francois Laisney ( Is Feenyism Catholic?' ,Angelus Press,SSPX ,USA) . The SSPX USA made a factual mistake.
So the TWO QUESTIONS are not answered by this District Superior and neither by the previous one.
How could Fr.Leonard Feeney be wrong when there cannot be any known exceptions?
Neither will they answer this question since they do not want to speak the truth. They do not want to be labelled anti Semitic. Though they are already wrongly labelled anti-semitic by the Jewish Left who misuse this leftist law, to stifle the Catholic Church.
Many Catholic priests in Rome to whom I have spoken to say there are no known exceptions and the Marchetti Letter of 1949 made an objective mistake. It assumed that the dead are visible.It is a fact of life, that we cannot see these exceptions.
Fr. Jurgen Wegner wil not comment.
Fr. Jurgen Wegner wil not comment.
Bishop Fellay has said that doctrinal questions must be clarified. 1 They should clarify this issue. Did Marchetti make an objective error? -Lionel Andrades
1.
http://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/fellay-doctrinal-questions-must-be-clarified-5120
January 29, 2015
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment