Rorate Caeili and Fr.Zuhlsdorf's interpretations are politically correct

On the internet only reports which interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the Marchetti inference and which criticize Fr.Leonard Feeney are allowed to be posted and read by the powers that be, on the Left.

Google Fr.Leonard Feeney and you will find reports which refer to the Tragic Errors of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Fr.Leonard Feeney condemned.

 

There are so many reports of mine on Fr.Leonard Feeney which cannot be accessed since I do not support Marchetti's objective error and so this would be an anti Semitic interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There is the unofficial censorship.

 

Even the SSPX and the sedevacantists have obliged and they interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the liberals and the Left and so their reports can be found prominently on the Internet.

 

It is like Rorate Caeili and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf saying that Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is the position of the liberals. So no one really minds on the internet.

However if they said that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite they could be blocked. This could be considered anti Semitic,racist or what not.

So Rorate Caeili and Fr.Zuhlsdorf's interpretations are politically correct.

-Lionel Andrades