SSPX ,Italy who have posted this report 1 also use the Marchetti inference. They use it in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and then reject the Council.They do not want to discuss this or comment on it. So they have removed my comment along with the article 2 from their website.
Fr.Mauro Tranquilo, their theologian at Albano, Italy who recently spoke at a conference with Prof. Roberto de Mattei is not aware that to claim that the baptism of desire is an exception to the Feenyite version of the dogma, is irrational. He does not realize that hypothetical cases cannot be defacto exceptions in the present times.We do not know any one in 2015 who does not need the baptism of water for salvation.So this was the objective error of the Marchetti letter in 1949 and the magisterium accepted it. So did the SSPX in Italy.
Fr.Mauro Tranquilo assumes also that Vatican Council II (Lumen Gentium 16) is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Yet if you read LG 16 it is does not say that there are any known cases in the present times or that these cases are exceptions to the dogma.Yet Fr.Mauro infers that LG 16 refers to known exceptions. LG 16 refers to hypothetical cases.
Even if they are saved without the baptism of water, as he interprets it, they cannot be defacto exceptions in the present times.
This is an error from the pontificate of Pope Pius XII whom the SSPX respects.They do not scall him a modernist pope.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
http://chiesaepostconcilio.blogspot.it/2015/02/prove-generali-del-vaticano-iii-contro.html
February 2, 2015
2.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment