Fr.John Hunwicke and Patrick Archbold want the SSPX to come into the Church accepting an irrational premise and inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II just as they have done.
They will not interpret Vatican Council II without the irrational proposition and inference since it would not be politically correct.It would be a threat to their work, their lifestyle.It would not be accepted by their superiors and could result in suspension.
In another case of making a virtue out of a necessty the two bloggers encourage the SSPX to reject traditional Catholic teaching , as they both have done with respect to Vatican Council II, with the use of an irrational premise and inference to interpret magisterial documents.
Neither are they pointing it out that some magisterial documents also use this irrationality(Dominus Iesus, Redemptoris Missio ) to emerge as a break with Tradition.
Fr. Hunwicke has a post on his blog on the SSPX and Unity 1. Passages of this post were re posted by Patrick Archbold on his blog.2
Fr. Hunwicke did not post a comment of mine in which I asked him to announce that 'We Catholics do not know of any exception to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So there cannot be an exception, in Vatican Council II to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)'.
What was so difficult about this one may ask ? Since this is common knowledge. We do not know any one on March 27, 2015 who will go to Heaven without Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.So there are no known exceptions to the traditional, strict interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
'We Catholics do not know of any exception to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued, So there cannot be an exception, in Vatican Council II ( 1960-1965)to EENS'.
Humanly, we cannot know of any exception to EENS in 2016-2017.So there still is no exception in Vatican Council II to EENS.
What was so complicated about all this for Fr.Hunwicke?
Yet he could not make this common place statement on his blog. He could not discuss it. Fr.Hunwicke works under the bishops in England who oversee the Anglican Ordinariate, where the Catholic Faith is compromised.If he makes this common place announcement he would be saying that there are no exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus mentioned in the Vatican Council II.This is not the official interpretation of the magisterium for the SSPX's entry into the Church with canonical status. The SSPX like the magisterium must say that Vatican Council II is a break with the past since it can only be interpreted with the irrational premise and inference.
The issue with the SSPX is not simply Vatican Council II. The real issue is Vatican Council II interpreted with or without the irrational premise and inference.
So Fr.Hunwicke and Patrick Archbold are both not going to comment on this issue.They both use the irrational premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II and this is acceptable to their superiors.They expect the SSPX to also compromise the Faith, for the sake of personal security etc, and make the same doctrinal error, to receive canonical status in the Catholic Church.
-Lionel Andrades
1
March 25, 2015
Fr.John Hunwicke on SSPX and Unity http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/frjohn-hunwicke-on-sspx-and-unity.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment