The Priestly Fraternity of St.Peter (FSSP) has changed Church teachings on family catechesis,religious education, salvation, mortal sin, ecclesiology...
There is no denial or clarification from the FSSP Rome to the last two posts on this blog 1 which I sent them.
The FSSP were allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum but were not permitted to proclaim traditional Catholic doctrine on family catechesis, in the preparation of First Communicants and for religious education. So they teach new doctrines.
This change in Church teaching ( Catechesis / religious education) was approved and implemented world wide by Cardinal Ratzinger, with the cooperation of Vatican congregations.
Fr. Joseph Kramer, the Pastor of the FSSP Church in Rome, Santissima dei Pelligrini and the FSSP priests, like the liberals and leftists, will not say that the ecclesiology of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II has not changed, since we do not and cannot know, of any exception to the dogma.
Instead here are the three irrational points FSSP priests use to interpret Magisterial documents.
1.Someone in the past is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus on March 25,2015.
2.Someone living will be an exception to the strict interpretation of the dogma today since he will be saved without faith and baptism.As if this can be known!
3.Someone in Heaven is an exception to the dogma on earth.As if we can see people in Heaven.
So they are unable to answer these TWO QUESTIONS:
TWO QUESTIONS
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible for us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla, or Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
If they answer these questions honestly Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus are Traditional. Ecclesiology is still exclusivist.
That we can see the dead saved without the baptism of water who are now in Heaven is an irrational premise to use in any reasoning. They must inform lay Catholics about this. They must correct this error in family catechesis and adult education.
That there is known salvation outside the Church of persons saved without faith and baptism, was the irrational premise used to change Church ecclesiology. It has been accepted by the FSSP and the Left.
So magisterial documents assume there is known salvation outside the Church and every one no longer needs to be a formal member of the Catholic Church to go to Heaven. The FSSP condones this error.
Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257 ..... all carry the following errors :
1) They infer that there are non Catholics in Heaven saved without 'faith and baptism'.
2) These persons are known to us on earth.They are personally known to become explicit exceptions to the traditional, exclusivist ecclesiology.
3) Since they are personally known, there are living exceptions to all needing to convert into the Church for salvation.
This is the 'new ecclesiology' that the FSSP pastor goes along with.
Here is the pattern again:
1.False, irrational premise/proposition.
2.Irrational, non traditional conclusion.
3.Ecclesiology has changed. A new theology is presented based on the false premise/proposition.
The irrational premise on which the new ecclesiology is settled is : in the present times ( 2015) non Catholics are known who are in Heaven without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith.
So the irrational inference which makes up the new ecclesiology is : there is salvation outside the Church.
Conclusion: the dogma on salvation and Tradtion in general are contradicted.
Conclusion: the dogma on salvation and Tradtion in general are contradicted.
This is attributed to Vatican Council II when it really should be attributed to the premise and inference.
With the FSSP approved irrational premise and inference, Cardinal Walter Kaspar wants a change in doctrine at the Synod on the Family 2015 .No FSSP priest can write or talk about it.They are already teaching these errors in family catechesis.
With the FSSP approved irrational premise and inference, Cardinal Walter Kaspar wants a change in doctrine at the Synod on the Family 2015 .No FSSP priest can write or talk about it.They are already teaching these errors in family catechesis.
For the FSSP and the magisterium there are 'elements of ecclesiality beyond the institutional boundaries of the Church' 2 and these known elements include persons saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire (without the baptism of water).These cases are personally known to all for them to be exceptions to Tradition, the Syllabus of Errors, extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc. So we have the Traditional Latin Mass without Tradition in Rome.
The irrationality accepted by the FSSP is to be adapted theologically to the Synod on the Family 2015. Pope Francis referred to the Synod today Wednesday during the morning audience .
Couldn’t some elements of sacramental marriage also be recognized in civil marriages in certain cases?-Cardinal Kaspar.
Lay Catholics in general do not know theology and FSSP priests are keeping silent for whatever reason.No FSSP priest has told Cardinal Kasper that there are no known salvific 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) known outside the Church. We cannot say that any non Catholic will be saved without Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.
To be an FSSP priest in Rome they have to hide the truth in family catechesis, and religious education.They allow lay Catholics to accept an irrational ecclesiology.This irrational ecclesiology is expected to be used at the Synod in October 3 and the FSSP are preparing people for it, with their silence and wrong catechesis.
No FSSP priest is willing to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus without the irrational premise and inference. So they are not going to affirm Vatican Council II in line with the rigorist interpretation of the dogma.It keeps life comfortable.Lay Catholics do not know about the scam.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
March 21, 2015
No denial from FSSP
FSSP priests in Rome not allowed to affirm Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus without three irrational points: no denial from religious community
2.
Hand picked Jesuits are somewhere out there writing their thesis on how elements of sacramental marriage can be recognised in civil and adulterous unions since there is salvation outside the Church
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment