Two standards on doctrine

Two standards on doctrine. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre accepted being saved in invincible ignorance as an explicit exception to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).So he approved Cardinal Francesco Marchetti's Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

However he rejected  invincible ignorance in Lumen Gentium 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. So he opposed Vatican Council II .

It was yes with the Letter and no with Vatican Council II.

Similarly Fr.Pierpaolo Petrucci, the SSPX District Superior in Italy,in his talks, accepts being saved in invincible ignorance according to the Marchetti Letter but rejects the same thing in Vatican Council II.

He welcomes the exception to EENS in the Letter but rejects it in Vatican Council II.

Ironically, being saved in invincible ignorance is not an exception to the strict interpretation of the dogma, the Feeneyite version.This is the point every one is missing in their doctrinal talks and 'doctrinal difficulties'.

Bishop Fellay made the same doctrinal mistake in one of his Letters to Friends and Benefactors.Neither will he or the CDF/Ecclesia Dei announce the mistake.

-Lionel Andrades

 

 

Doctrinal difficulties exist within the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's position on Vatican Council II and Tradition http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/doctrinal-difficulties-exist-within.html