Feeneyite presense: This site Promotes Feeneyites: a TRUE Schizmatic Worthless for your faith, Worthless for your soul. Ignore!
Lack of proper Thomistic theology is the root of the error of the Feeneyites
Lack of proper Thomistic theology is the root of the error of the Feeneyites
Lionel:
St.Thomas Aquinas was a Feeneyite. He held the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It was Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Cardinal Richard Cushing who were not Feeneyites. They inferred that there was known salvation outside the Church and these cases were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For the first time in Church history they postulated that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire were exceptions to the dogma.
1.They did not personally know of any person saved outside the Church.
2.No magisterial document before 1949 made this claim.
Mystici Corporis, Council of Trent etc only mention the possibility of a person being saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire. That's all!. They do not postulate that these cases are known to us personally, or can be known to us, for them to be exceptions.Neither do they state that these cases are exceptions.
Marchetti and Cushing took the liberty of making 'the leap'. They inferred that people in Heaven are visble and known on earth to be exceptions to the dogma! The visible-dead theory of Marchetti!
Cushing also placed this irrationality in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14 etc) to cause confusion.
They were supported by the secular media.So Catholics do not realize that Cushingism is heresy and Feeneyism is de fide.Cushingism rejects the dogma defined by three Church Councils, it changes the Nicene Creed's 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' to 'I believe in three or more baptisms, all without the baptism of water' and it interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise. So Vatican Council II contradicts itself and the dogma on exclusive salvation. The contradiction is there only because of the irrational Cushingite premise.Without the premise, Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.
The contemporary Magisterium is using Cushingism with a false premise,inference and conclusion.
It was Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Cardinal Richard Cushing who were not Feeneyites. They inferred that there was known salvation outside the Church and these cases were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For the first time in Church history they postulated that being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire were exceptions to the dogma.
1.They did not personally know of any person saved outside the Church.
2.No magisterial document before 1949 made this claim.
Mystici Corporis, Council of Trent etc only mention the possibility of a person being saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire. That's all!. They do not postulate that these cases are known to us personally, or can be known to us, for them to be exceptions.Neither do they state that these cases are exceptions.
Marchetti and Cushing took the liberty of making 'the leap'. They inferred that people in Heaven are visble and known on earth to be exceptions to the dogma! The visible-dead theory of Marchetti!
Cushing also placed this irrationality in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14 etc) to cause confusion.
They were supported by the secular media.So Catholics do not realize that Cushingism is heresy and Feeneyism is de fide.Cushingism rejects the dogma defined by three Church Councils, it changes the Nicene Creed's 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' to 'I believe in three or more baptisms, all without the baptism of water' and it interprets Vatican Council II with an irrational premise. So Vatican Council II contradicts itself and the dogma on exclusive salvation. The contradiction is there only because of the irrational Cushingite premise.Without the premise, Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.
The contemporary Magisterium is using Cushingism with a false premise,inference and conclusion.
-Lionel Andrades
__________________________
April 12,2015: Divine Mercy SundayToday I was led by an Angel to the chasms of hell. ~ It is a place of great torture; how awesomely large Iand extensive it is! The kinds of torture I saw:
the first torture that constitutes hell is the loss of God;
the second torture is perpetual remorse of conscIence;
the third is that one's condition will never change;
the fourth is the fire that will penetrate the soul without destroying it -
a terrible suffering, since it is a purely spiritual fire, lit by God's anger;
the firth torture is continual darkness and a terrible suffocating smell,
and, despite the darkness, the devils and the souls of the damned see each other
and all the evil, both others and their own;
the sixth torture is the constant company of Satan;
the seventh torture is horrible despair, hatred of God, vile words, curses
and blasphemies.
These are the tortures suffered by all the dammed together, but
that is not the end of the sufferings. There arc special tortures destined for
particular souls. These are the torments of the senses: Each soul undergoes
terrible and indescribable sufferings, related to the manner in which it has
sinned. There arc caverns and pits of torture where one form of agony differs
from another. I would have died at the very sight of these tortures if the
omnipotence of God had not supported me.
Let the sinner know that he will be tortured throughout all eternity, in those senses which he made use of to sin.
I am writing this at the command of God, so that no soul may find an excuse by saying there is no hell, or that nobody has ever been there, and so no one can say what it is like.
I, Sister Faustina, by the order of God, have visited the abysses of hell so that I might tell souls about it and testify to its existence. I cannot speak about it now; but I have received a command from God to leave it in writing. The devils were full of hatred for me, but they had to obey me at the command of God .
What I have written is but a pale shadow of the things I saw. But I noticed one thing: that most of the souls there are those who disbelieved that 11 there is a hell. When I came to, I could hardly recover from the fright. How terribly souls suffer there! Consequently, I pray even more fervently for the conversion of sinners. I incessantly plead God's mercy upon them. 0 my Jesus I would rather be in agony until the end of the world, amidst the greatest suffering, than offend You by the least of sin.. (Diary 741)
Let the sinner know that he will be tortured throughout all eternity, in those senses which he made use of to sin.
I am writing this at the command of God, so that no soul may find an excuse by saying there is no hell, or that nobody has ever been there, and so no one can say what it is like.
I, Sister Faustina, by the order of God, have visited the abysses of hell so that I might tell souls about it and testify to its existence. I cannot speak about it now; but I have received a command from God to leave it in writing. The devils were full of hatred for me, but they had to obey me at the command of God .
What I have written is but a pale shadow of the things I saw. But I noticed one thing: that most of the souls there are those who disbelieved that 11 there is a hell. When I came to, I could hardly recover from the fright. How terribly souls suffer there! Consequently, I pray even more fervently for the conversion of sinners. I incessantly plead God's mercy upon them. 0 my Jesus I would rather be in agony until the end of the world, amidst the greatest suffering, than offend You by the least of sin.. (Diary 741)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment