Vocations to the religous life have to accept an irrationality in the Catechism of the Catholic Church

There were prayers for Vocations yesterday Sunday at Mass in Italian.

Of course those who choose the religious life in the Catholic Church would have to accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 846,1257).

846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body: 

Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.

1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them. Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament. The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit." God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.

 

In a previous blog post I mentioned that an irrationality is being taught in the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 846,1257).However you may interpret the Catechism or Vatican Council II, an objective error, is still being taught in catechism class in schools.

that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
This implies that there is no rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since there are known exceptions. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is a known exception. This is false and irrational.

Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
Who are these people ? There are no such known cases in 2015. So they are irrelevant to the rigorist interpretation of the dogma.

 but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.
Why since there are known exceptions to the dogma?

Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
Who are these people? They are zero cases for us in April 2015.So why mention it ? Is it being inferred that these are known exceptions to the dogma?

Michael Voris says all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church(See video Do Non Catholics Go to Hell?). This is the new theology which accomodates the Marchetti error i.e the dead now saved in Heaven are visible to us on earth. So those who are saved with the baptism of desire etc refer to visible cases. So they are visible exceptions. They become exceptions, it is reasoned, to the traditional teaching on exclusive salavtion in the Church. This was the error implied in the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 (Outside the Church No Salvation).The new theology accomodates visible exceptions to the dogma. The new theology replaces the traditional exclusivist theology.

Also when Michael Voris says God is not limited to the Sacraments, after the Resurrection of Jesus, he again uses new theology.It accomodates Cardinal Marchetti's factual error. This is the dead man walking theology.The dogma says God is limited to the Sacraments.So how would those who wrote the Catechism (1992) know of an exception to the dogma.With the visible-dead theory of course!

Catholic students in catechesis and religion class are taught this objective error.They affirm the dead man walking and visible theory. This is accepted by Michael Voris.Since he has accepted the new theology based on the irrational premise and inference.

The children are taught :-

1. We human beings can physically see the dead in Heaven.

2. We can know someone in Heaven in the present times who is there without 'faith and baptism'.

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger  could not physically see any exception in Heaven when he wrote the Catechism.Today  school children have to infer that there are exceptions to the dogma or that there can be exceptions to the dogma on salvation.Even those with a vocation to the religious life have to proclaim this irrationality. It is common sense that there cannot be exceptions.Yet a young girl with a vocation to the religious life would be rejected in Detroit, if she did not say that there were exceptions, known to her, to the rigorist interpretation of the dogma.-Lionel Andrades