How did the new ecclesiology develop ?
Answer: With the four following mistakes.
1. The Church Fathers and the Medieval Fathers did not make a link between baptism of desire ( BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).It was liberal theologians who made the connection.It was done best by Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.
2.No magisterial document before 1949 connects BOD, BOB with EENS.It was separated.
3.No magisterial document before 1949 says BOD,BOB cases are explicit for us in daily life.No church document says these cases are objective for us .We cannot judge who will be saved with BOD or BOB, with or without the baptism of water (BOW).
4.In our personal experience we do not know anyone saved outside the Church i.e without 'faith and baptism'. We do not know any one who contradicts the dogma EENS which says all need to be formal members of the Church, all need the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for salvation.
Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani could not have personally known someone saved outside the Church.
So we can affirm the traditional 'rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS since there are no pesonally known exceptions and there are none mentioned in magisterial documents.If there were it would be a factual error.
So there are no exceptions to John 3:5, Mk.16:16.
Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and Pope Pius XII was factually wrong and teaching heresy.
The ecclesiology of the Catholic Church has not changed since there is no new revelation.The new ecclesiology is based on the Marchetti error.
The old ecclesiology is applicable to the Traditional Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass.It can be affirmed by the new Catholic Movements and all Catholics in general.-Lionel Andrades