Wednesday, August 5, 2015

Most Rev. Donald Sanborn, Fr. Cekada, Fr. Joseph Selway, Fr. Nicolas Désposito, Rev. Julian Larrabee.- ALL SILENT

Most Rev. Donald Sanborn, Fr. Cekada, Fr. Joseph Selway, Fr. Nicolas Désposito, Rev. Julian Larrabee.- ALL SILENT



Bp.Sanborn tells me to not send him any mail. Is this all he can say?
The seminary faculty know I am correct and they are keeping silent.
  There is a mistake on this page of the seminary?

-Lionel Andrades


3. The Seminary proposes, as the solution to the aberrations of Vatican II, the complete rejection of this council as a false council, including its decrees and enactments. The Second Vatican Council manifested itself to be a false council, and devoid of the assistance of the Holy Ghost, by the fact that it promulgated doctrines which were previously condemned by the Church 
Lionel:
There are aberrations in Vatican Council II for the seminary, since LG 16,LG 8, UR 3 etc refer to known cases in 2015. If these were considered hypothetical possibilities they would not be exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors etc.But they are not hypothetical possibilities for the faculty.
The fault is not with the Council but with the wrong inference used by the seminary.
For example if Lumen Gentium 16 ( saved in invincible ignorance) refers to explicit, objective and  seen in the flesh cases in 2015 or the past, then there would exceptions in Vatican Council II to the the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors etc.
For me Lumen Gentium 16 refers to hypothetical possibilities known only to God. Hypothetical cases cannot be  objectively known in 2015.
So these cases would be followed with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church for the person to be saved. This is the dogmatic teaching.
Anyway they always refer to theoretical cases, speculation and can never be defacto, objective cases on earth.
This is the error made by the faculty and students of this sedevacantist seminary in Florida,USA.

No comments: