Monday, September 28, 2015

LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc do not contradict EENS : Abp. Lefebvre's excommunication was a mistake

Immagine correlata

Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2 etc are  not explicit for us human beings.So they are not exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church in 2015, they do not contradict  extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Vatican Council II supports the old ecclesiology and the Feeneyite version of the dogma.
This was not known to the Magisterium of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger who interpreted Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc being explicit and a break with the the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.There position on Vatican Council II was irrational. It was a break with Tradition. It was heretical.Since in ignorance they did not realize their fault they excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre for not accepting their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Neither did they explain to him that there was a choice. LG 16 etc could be interpreted as being hypothetical and known only to God. So it would be irrelevant to the old ecclesiology.
Based on this error they supported a new ecclesiology and a new theology, a fantasy theology which suggested that there is salvation outside the Church and these cases are known to us human beings, or were known to human beings in the past.
So the excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was not based on the teachings of the Catholic Church but a new doctrine created with an irrational premise and inference.
The irrational premise was that we could see and know persons in Heaven, and that these persons were there without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. The irrational inference was that these 'known cases' were explicit exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism' (AG 7) to avoid Hell.So the thrice defined dogma on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as interpreted by the Church Councils, popes and saints,was made redundant.
It was an innocent error by the Magisterium. Since even Archbishop Lefebvre was not aware of the error.
During the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI there were SSPX-Vatican doctrinal talks and the SSPX professor of ecclesiology Fr. Jean Marie Gleize was also unaware of the doctrinal error.-Lionel Andrades

Magisterium should apologise to the SSPX for the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre


No comments: