For example, they are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), when there are no known exceptions to EENS in 2015 and neither can there ever be exceptions for us human beings.
So they are not obliged to say Vatican Council II mentions exceptions to EENS , when LG 16 etc cannot be explicit in our reality.
They must not be forced to create a new theology based on an irrational inference i.e LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to objectively known cases in our time (2015).
Even Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate(F.I) priests who offer only the Novus Ordo Mass should not be expected to promote all this nonsense in the name of allegiance to the pope or something else.
Similarly the F.I priests who offer only the TLM should not be asked to accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston which suggested that there was salvation outside the Church.Humanly speaking no one at that time could know of any one saved outside the Church.Neither were there any such cases known in pre-1949 times.
With this irrationality a new ecclesiology is created and the F.I priests are not obliged to follow it.
How can people in Heaven known only to God and saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance be exceptions on earth to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS. The Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston clearly made a factual error.It is a fact of life that we cannot see or know people in Heaven.
This error was a break with the understanding of Church associated with the TLM before the Baltimore Catechism (1808) was issued.
How could the Baltimore Catechism suggest 1) implicit desire for the baptism of water by a catechumenen who dies before receiving it and 2) martyrdom, were baptisms, like the baptism of water? The baptism of water is seen and repeatable while the baptism of desire and blood cannot be given. They are unknown to us and known only to God.How can they be considered baptisms when they don't exist in our reality and we do not know of a single case.
So why must the Franciscans of the Immaculate who offer only the TLM have to accept three known baptisms instead of one? The Nicene Creed says there is only one baptism.
With all this irrationality making up the new ecclesiology the Franciscan priests along with Fr.Stefano Mannelli F.I, the founder of the community, will have to proclaim Jesus without the necessity of the Church for salvation( similar to the Protestants).They will have to proclaim the Kingdom of God without the necessity of Catholic Faith and the baptism of water(AG 7,LG 14). This is contrary to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14 ) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Why must Fr.Settimo Mannelli F.I, the former Rector of the seminary at Santa Maria di Nazareth, Boccea, which Pope Francis closed down,have to accept all this irrational reasoning and theology.All this is a new ecclesiology and a break with the traditional ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.The traditional ecclesiology did not violate common sense and fundamental premises held by man, like, us not being able to see people in Heaven while we are on earth.-Lionel Andrades