Michael Matt's response to the Paris terror is the same as Pope Francis

Michael Matt says on the video (7:36) 'most important, the only way out of this is for the Catholic Church to restore her Tradition, to go back to her roots to rise up as the mighty moral authority that gave compass to the entire world Catholic or not for two thousand years, this is the only way, the only reason we have chaos is because the Catholic Church has reneged on her own claim to be the sole means of salvation, the true Church founded by Jesus Christ.'

For the Magisterium doctrinally the Catholic Church in 2015 is not that of the one in pre 1808 times.This has been accepted by the traditionalists and sedevancantists.They have accepted the magisterial doctrinal error on salvation and they are part of the problem.

If they were part of the solution they would be announcing that the Catholic Church teaches according to Vatican Council II, Muslims are on the way to Hell-fire at the time of death unless they convert into the Catholic Church.

This is not possible since Michael Matt has rejected Feeneyism and accepted Cushingism.Cushingism is irrational and heretical and supported by the Masons and the contemporary magisterium of the Church.Cardinals Muller, Kasper, Koch and Marx are Cushingites. So was Cardinal Ratzinger.The proof is there in their public statements.

Cushingites will not say that Pope Pius XII made an objective error when he assumed the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) all without the baptism of water, were exceptions to the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
For me since that time ecclesiology has radically changed in the Church. Pope Pius XII is the Father of the New Theology. The Catholic Church ' reneged on her own claim to be the sole means of salvation, the true Church founded by Jesus Christ.'

For me BOD, BOB and I.I are not explicit.So they are not exceptions to the dogma EENS as interpreted by the Feeneyities St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine,St. Anthony Marie Claret, St. Teresa of Avila, St. Maximillian Kolbe and other saints and popes.So there cannot be a new ecclesiology. There cannot be anything in Vatican Council II to contradict Feeneyism.So I interpret Vatican Council II as a Feeneyite.

According to Vatican Council II 'all' Muslims  and other non Christians  need 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14) for salvation.There are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for me, since LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc are invisible and known only to God. Vatican Council II for me is in agreement with the dogma EENS when it tells us all need to be formal members of the Church, all need the baptism of water in the Catholic Church to avoid the fires of Hell, as does Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441.

According to Vatican Council II all Muslims are oriented to the fires of Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church.

So why cannot Michael Matt say this? Why cannot Rorate Caeili or Christopher Ferrara mention this?

Why cannot Michael Matt admit that Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops are Cushingites  like the magisterial Curia of Pope Francis?

If Michael Matt would affirm the Catholic Faith like me, then when the opposition says the Church has changed its teachings after Vatican Council II , he could cite the text of Vatican Council II  which contradicts them (AG 7, LG 14).

If they say LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 and NA 2 are exceptions to EENS he could mention that these citations refer to cases which are invisible for us and known only to God.Invisible cases cannot be de facto exceptions in 2015  to all needing to enter the Church. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions in the present times.Theoretical cases are zero cases in our reality.Possibilities are not known realities.

In this way there would be unity in doctrine for Michael Matt .Vatican Council II does not contradict itself(LG 16 vs AG 7)  and it does not contradict the dogma on salvation (LG 16 vs EENS). Vatican Council II is not a break with the Feeneyites St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Ignatius of Loyola, St.Francis Xavier, St. Robert Bellarmine -and of course, Fr.Leonard Feeney.Our position on Islam today is the same as all of  them.

So when will Michael Matt announce this?

There are so many lay supporters of the SSPX who are in confusion about Islam.They are Cushingites who support Feeneyite saints.They are aware of the obvious gap in theology.They know there is confusion in the Church and they wrongly blame it on Vatican Council II.

Michael Matt mentions the vapid response of Pope Francis' secular political leaders - but neither has Michael Matt or the SSPX leaders issued a statement saying that the Catholic Church still teaches that all Muslims are on the way to the fires of Hell, without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith.

-Lionel Andrades