The great exponents of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) all agree with me. The Latin Mass is heretical in its contemporary form, because of the theology.Fr.John Hunwicke, Christopher Ferrara, Michael Matt, Joseph Shaw... have no denial. They know what I am saying is correct.With the irrational theology of Cushingism, they have discarded the old ecclesiology, associated with the TLM. They have replaced the old ecclesiology, with heresy, knocking out dogmas and doctrine and offering/ attending Holy Mass with this sin of faith.
With Cushingism as a theology which says the dead now saved in Heaven are known and visible to us on earth in the present times, they have brought a new element into the Mass.
The rational alternative is Feeneyism, which is traditional and dogmatic, but the traditionalists are not allowed to offer Mass, with this exclusivist theology. The Left will not allow it.Heresy is a pre requisite for offering the TLM.
They now offer the Sacrifice of Jesus with ancient rituals and traditional vestments but with an innovative theology and understanding of salvation and the Church.
When Fr.John Hunwicke for example, offers the TLM he cannot affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), like the saints did before the Council of Trent. Cushingism is approved by the English bishops and the Vatican. So there are alleged explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS.This is heresy approved by the contemporary magisterium.
I affirm Feeneyism as a theology ( there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS) so I am not denying the dogma , as it was known by the saints and popes, over the centuries, when they offered the TLM.
I am not in heresy and am free to receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass.
Joseph Shaw as a layman is not free to do so. Since heresy is a mortal sin.This is the traditional Catholic teaching.To knowingly receive the Eucharist in mortal sin is a sacriledge.It brings the condemnation of God, instead of blessings and healing.Professor Joseph Shaw is a Cushingite like the English bishops.They give him permission to teach Cushingism as a theology.
With Feeneyism there is one baptism for the forgiveness of sin. With Cushingism there are three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( water, desire and blood). For Archbishop Kevin Macdonald and the English bishops there could be even more, seeds of the Word (AG 11) etc.
This is a rejection of the Nicene Creed.They have rejected it through changing its meaning.It is a rejection of the Nicene Creed by Fr. John Hunwicke, Christopher Ferrara, Michael Matt, Joseph Shaw, the English bishops...They have changed doctrine.In practise the lay persons receive the Eucharist at Mass and the priests offer Holy Mass with this first class heresy.
Talk to them and they will confirm this. They will say there are three baptisms. They will say every one does not need to defacto receive the baptism of water. They will say that the baptism of desire is an exception to all needing to formally enter the Church with the baptism of water and Catholic Faith. In other words these hypothetical cases are explicit for them to be exceptions to the traditional teaching. In other words they can see or know people in Heaven in the present times, saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water. They will say, 'Yes, all this is true and it is magisterial! And we accept it!'.
With Feeneyism ( there are no explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS) I have not violated the Creed or the dogma EENS. I have not changed doctrine.I am free to receive the Eucharist at the TLM or Novus Ordo Mass.Free in conscience. In practise even if I was a heretic they would allow me to receive the Eucharist.
Catholics in general are in heresy and are receiving the Eucharist since they do not know theology and they are not aware that the magisterium has been promoting Cushingism, which is irrational, non traditional and heretical. It was an innovation which came into the Catholic Church in a big way with the Letter of the Holy office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. This was an inter- office Letter which was made public by the Archdiocese three years after it was issued. Reports say it was tampered. with The Letter contradicts itself and contradicts the pre-1949 Magisterium on salvation.
It made the original mistake now accepted by traditionalists too. It switched traditional Feeneyism with Cushingism.Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre accepted it.I am not obliged to accept it however the SSPX and sedevacantist bishops will not give up the error.
The traditionalists now agree with me.They do not contradict these blog posts.The traditional Latin Mass is heretical.They are in heresy. They have changed the original theology. They have changed the theology and so have changed the doctrines.They have changed the meaning of the Nicene and Athansius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. With the new theology they also interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the old ecclesiology.
None of the traditionalists have contradicted what I have said and have been repeating in blog posts over the last few years.I have been also asking the sedevacantists, Cushingites,if Lumen Gentium 16 refers to explicit or implicit cases, someone visible or invisible. No one will answer this simple question. They know what the implications of their answer will be.
The traditionalists are offering/attending the TLM with the error of Pope Pius XII. It was Cardinal Richard Cushing who was in heresy and Fr. Leonard Feeney who was de fide - but for Fr.Hunwicke,Joseph Shaw, the English bishops, popes and the Vatican Curia it is the opposite.