Saturday, February 20, 2016

There is an objective mistake in Vatican Council

May be a cardinal or bishop would not give Vatican Council II an imprimatur.

1. Since there is a factual error in Lumen Gentium 14.
2.Since the factual error was made in the 1949 Letter to the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston with an irrational inference, the Council is 'full of' hypothetical passages which the Vatican Curia interprets as being explicit, objectively seen.
Here is the error in the Letter of the Holy Office.
Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
Related image 
The error was repeated in Vatican Council II.
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.-Lumen Gentium 14 
Let me explain.
Since being saved in invincible ignorance was considered explicit, it was inferred that these, allegedly objective cases, were exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So it was concluded every one needed to formally enter the Church ( with faith and baptism) except for those who are saved in invincible ignorance etc.
So Lumen Gentium 14 clarified that those who know about the Church, 'whosoever, therefore, knowing ', had an obligation to enter the Church and to remain in it to avoid Hell.
Those who were ignorant, it was inferred (like the natives in North America before the missionaries went there) did not have an obligation to enter the Church. They would be saved in invincible ignorance.
So this is a new theology based on an objective error, that of being able to see or know people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and in invincible ignorance etc.
On this point a cardinal could object to giving the imprimatur to Vatican Council II...
There is a clear mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office and Vatican Council II which originated from the Baltimore Catechism.In all this we can see America emerging as a superpower and the American Church influencing the Catholic Church, in a negative way. The aim seemed to be,eliminate the dogma EENS...1
-Lionel Andrades

There is an objective mistake in Vatican Council II.It is responsible for 'the Vatican moment' which Rorate Caeili mentions

No comments: