Vatican Council II is no more an issue.We have found the factual error in the Council and it is linked to the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston: SSPX - Vatican talks

So Vatican Council II is no more an issue after we have discovered the factual error in Vatican Council II.
SSPX has simply to announce that they accept Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, with no known exceptions to the dogma EENS instead of known exceptions, with no known salvation outside the Church instead of known salvation.

Comment on the blog The Eponymous Flower , Remnant Warns (Threatens?) SSPX They'll be in Schism if they Don't Play Ball With Vatican

Joseph,
Vatican Council II is no more an issue.We have found the factual error in the Council and it is linked to the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.
The 1949 Letter assumed hypothetical cases were explicit i.e objectively visible.Then this error in reasoning has been placed all over Vatican Council II.
If we read Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being just that - hypothetical, the Council changes. It is then not in contradiction but in accord with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Feeneyite version. So then there are no exceptions to the old ecclesiology. This is the ecclesiology which the SSPX can support. Since it means there is no change in the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and all non Catholics need to formally convert into the Church to avoid Hell.
So Vatican Council II is no more an issue after we have discovered the factual error in Vatican Council II.
SSPX has simply to announce that they accept Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism, with no known exceptions to the dogma EENS instead of known exceptions, with no known salvation outside the Church instead of known salvation.
Similarly they(SSPX)  need to announce that they reject Vatican Council II with Cushingism, with the irrational premise and inference used to interpret the Council. So they can ask the contemporary magisterium, to stop interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism, which is irrational, non traditional and heretical.
Cushingism cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake, nor contradict the magisterium of the Church before the Council of Trent.
The Council interpreted with Feeneyism changes the discussion between the SSPX and the Vatican. It is the Vatican Curia which will now be on the defensive. The SSPX simply has to ask the CDF/Ecclesia Dei to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite version).

The St. Benedict Centers, traditionalists, can also ask the Vatican to do the same.
The SSPX and the SBC could begin the dialogue by affirming Vatican Council II in public interpreted without the false premise and inference, which makes the Council a break with Tradition.
It's a win-win situation now.

Here are two posts from my blog which will help in understanding what I have written above.
There are many posts on EucharistandMission which explain this error in Vatican Council II which is still not being discussed by tradtionalists or liberals.

For over two years the falsehood is clear at Dallas but not proclaimed at the local level : from school to university Catholics are taught the false premise
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/for-over-two-years-falsehood-is-clear.html

CDF Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.j repeats the error of the 1949 Holy Office Letter : the mistake was placed in Vatican Council in so many passages
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/cdf-notification-on-dupuis-repeats.html
-Lionel Andrades


https://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2016/02/remnant-warns-threatens-sspx-theyll-be.html?showComment=1456331654720#c2530889083755461609

https://www.saintbenedict.com/