Since we now know hypothetical cases cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus re-read Vatican Council II without the old conditioning

Comments from the blog The Eponymous Flower

Lionel:

It's not problematic in this case.Since we now know hypothetical cases cannot be exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So we re-read Vatican Council II without the old conditioning.
The Councils comes out traditional and Feeneyite.

Tancred and the SBC ( Richmond N.H and Still River) are interpreting Vatican Council as the Masons would want them to do so.


Eleonore Villarrubia teaches Catholic school children to interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational inference and as a break with the dogma EENS ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/eleonore-villarrubia-teaches-catholic.html

They are not announcing that LG 16 for example refers to an invisible and not a visible case.This is something but obvious but yet they will not comment on it.Tancred possibly has to ask Brother Andre Marie's permission before commenting on this.

This is something simple but they are avoiding it it.
Here are two questions which they will not answer.This maintains the problem.

1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2016 ?


2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible for us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
________________________

The same problem is there with the FSSP and the SSPX.

No denial from FSSP
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/no-denial-from-fssp.html

-Lionel Andrades

https://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/2016/03/catholic-cardinal-and-masonic-lodge.html?showComment=1457810482185#c509673953501565989
3