Cardinal Burke accepts the liberal moral and faith teachings which have been changed with exceptions, so called known exceptions in the present times.

We respect Cardinal Raymond Burke but let's face it, hypothetical cases ( baptism of desire etc) are pastorally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) .Since the time he was a bishop at La Crosse he would not affirm the 'rigorist' interpretation of the dogma EENS.Hypothetical cases are also pastorally known exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin for him. So he has no problem with Amoris Laetitia on this point.Doctrine has changed with this irrationality. 

Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Cushingism which says there are known exceptions to the extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Cushingism is not part of 'the whole Tradition of the Church', to which he refers to.It was not there before the Council of Trent. There was no explictly known, objectively seen case of the baptism of desire which was an explicit exception to the dogma EENS. This was the creation of liberal theologians after the Council of Trent.The baptism of desire had nothing to do with the dogma EENS.

Cardinal Raymond Burke and Fr.John Hardon were also interpreting hypothetical cases (baptism of desire, invincible ignorance) as being exceptions to the traditional teachings on salvation and in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Doctrine has been changed. Pope Benedict confirmed it last month in a statement given to Avvenire on extra  ecclesiam nulla salus.
For him there were exceptions to the dogma EENS in Vatican Council II.So EENS was no more like  in the 16th century. Now we have Amoris Laetitiae which says there are exceptions to  a couple living in mortal sin ( irregular situation).Pope Francis indicates the concept of  mortal sin held in the 16th century is there no more. So doctrine has changed.

Cardinal Burke  also uses the moral theology of the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1992) which promotes 'known exceptions' existing.They are exceptions  to the traditional understanding of mortal sin etc.Amoris Laetitia(AL) is based on this new moral theology, the heretical theology.

Since Cardinal Raymond Burke accepts the liberal moral theology, which affirms known exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin he will not have noticed this error in Amoris Laetitia.

Cardinal Burke does not note that in the Catechism of the Catholic Church doctrine had been changed on faith ( salvation) and morals( mortal sin) with alleged known exceptions.The new theology which he affirms is based on this irrationality. The currently 'officially approved' theology is Cushingism. It is heretical. It is irrational and non traditional. It is approved by Cardinal Burke.

It is important to note.

1) We do not know any one in the present times (2016) who is an exception to the traditional moral teaching i.e who is living in adultery, concubinage etc and will not go to Hell. Neither do the popes personally know of someone who is an exception.

2) No one in the past knew of any exception to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.Everyone who is living in mortal sin is on the way to Hell.No one in the past saw someone in Heaven who was an exception to the moral law.

Archbishop Lefebvre too assumed we knew of exceptions to the dogma EENS.Archbishop Lefebvre was not told that Vatican Council II can be intepreted with Feeneyism (i.e  LG 16 is invisible and so is not an explicit exception to EENS.There are no exceptions).With Feeneyism the dogma EENS could not have developed for Pope Benedict. It could not develop, I repeat. But Cardinal Burke is not going to affirm the 'rigorist' interpretation of the dogma EENS.He is not going to say that Cardinal Ratzinger, the magisterium, made a mistake in the Archbishop Lefebvre case.The issue was doctrine and the magisterium had it wrong.

The magisterium still has it wrong.But there is no correction coming from Cardinal Burke on this point.

If Vatican Council II is interpreted without known exceptions to EENS the Council changes dramatically. Cardinal Burke will not say anything about this.

If there are no known exceptions to the moral teachings of the Church then Amoris Laetitiae has made a mistake. Cardinal Burke needs to point this out.

But since there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS for him, since there is salvation outside the Church for him,Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a break with Tradition, it is a break with EENS( Feeneyite).

Since there are known exceptions to mortal sin,for him, Amoris Laetitiae is not a break with traditional moral teaching for him.

He is a liberal, accepting the liberal moral and faith teachings which have been changed with exceptions, so called known exceptions in the present times.

-Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Raymond Burke ignores the new moral theology upon which Amoris Laetitia is based since he and Pope Benedict use the same irrational theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-raymond-burke-ignores-new.html

The two popes and most of the Jesuits assume there is known salvation outside the Church. Upon this irrationality(personally knowing people saved or about to be saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water) they have based their new theology in faith and morals

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/the-two-popes-and-most-of-jesuits.html

Cushingism is not part of the whole Tradition of the Church. Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Cushingism: Amoris Laetitia is based on the new moral theology, the heretical theology http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cushingism-is-not-part-of-whole.html

Cardinal Raymond Burke accepts the liberal moral theology, which affirms known exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.So he will not have noticed this error in Amoris Laetitia http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-raymond-burke-accepts-liberal.html

Cardinal Ratzinger also did not tell Archbishop Lefebvre that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with Feeneyism. The Archbishop and the SSPX bishops were rejecting Cushingite Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-ratzinger-also-did-not-tell.html

We have the Anonymous Christian according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church approved by Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Schonborn

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/we-have-anonymous-christian-according.html