With Amoris Laeititia's 'situation ethics', 'subjectivism' and 'known exceptions to mortal sin', the traditional doctrine on mortal sin, salvation, receiving the Eucharist and sacrilege has been changed http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/with-amoris-laeititias-situation-ethics.html
If we eliminate the 'known exceptions' theory, Cardinal Marx and Cardinal Kasper would have to admit that there is no change in doctrine : Vatican Council II supports the 16th century Jesuit missionaries http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/if-we-eliminate-known-exceptions-theory.html
Lionel:
The new theology was used to justify liberal dispensations and annulments.This is the practical 'exceptions factory' that we all know of: Amoris Laetitia officially approves this
Situation Ethics is used in churning out annulments and dispensations.All these years marriages were officially broken by the Church. Catholics were allowed to live in adultery in an inter-faith marriage and also receive the Eucharist.It was assumed that there could be some hypothetical reason for separating a Catholic marriage.
The blog owner at Vox Cantoris has received an annulment of his first marriage and has married a second time... What about the feelings of the first wife? I don't know.He criticizes the Novus Ordo Mass but he 'recognises' the annulment of his marriage given at a Novus Ordo parish.
Now Amoris Laetitia is saying recognise the right of a divorced and remarried Catholic, who is living in mortal sin, to also have his situation regularised.
Similarly the blog owner at AKA Catholic criticizes the Novus Ordo Mass. But he accepts the dispensation he received at a Novus Ordo Mass to marry a non Catholic.He does not consider himself presently living in adultery.The bishop who gave him the dispensation of course did not believe in the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS).He is allowed to receive the Eucharist.
Just as bishops apply situation ethics to morals they also apply it to faith issues. The bishops assume there are some situations when the baptism of desire and blood happen without the baptism of water and they are in known situation in our reality. This is irrational but this what they believe. This was also the position of Cardinal Raymond Burke when he was the Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal in Rome.So this reasoning gives all of them a chance to reject the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.This is the situation ethics in faith and salvation theology.
Since there is a rejection of the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, because of hypothetical cases being exceptions,in hypothetical situations, the bishops with the approval of the pope, allow Catholics to marry Jews and Muslims and do not consider the couples as being in mortal sin.
So we have Amoris Laeititia saying a mortal sin is not aways a mortal sin(301).It is officially acknowledging what has been the practise 'on the ground' for so many years all over the world.
The new theology was used to justify liberal dispensations and annulments This is the practical 'exceptions factory' that we all know of.-Lionel Andrades
6:08 am, April 22, 2016
Situation Ethics is used in churning out annulments and dispensations.All these years marriages were officially broken by the Church. Catholics were allowed to live in adultery in an inter-faith marriage and also receive the Eucharist.It was assumed that there could be some hypothetical reason for separating a Catholic marriage.
The blog owner at Vox Cantoris has received an annulment of his first marriage and has married a second time... What about the feelings of the first wife? I don't know.He criticizes the Novus Ordo Mass but he 'recognises' the annulment of his marriage given at a Novus Ordo parish.
Now Amoris Laetitia is saying recognise the right of a divorced and remarried Catholic, who is living in mortal sin, to also have his situation regularised.
Similarly the blog owner at AKA Catholic criticizes the Novus Ordo Mass. But he accepts the dispensation he received at a Novus Ordo Mass to marry a non Catholic.He does not consider himself presently living in adultery.The bishop who gave him the dispensation of course did not believe in the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS).He is allowed to receive the Eucharist.
Just as bishops apply situation ethics to morals they also apply it to faith issues. The bishops assume there are some situations when the baptism of desire and blood happen without the baptism of water and they are in known situation in our reality. This is irrational but this what they believe. This was also the position of Cardinal Raymond Burke when he was the Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal in Rome.So this reasoning gives all of them a chance to reject the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS.This is the situation ethics in faith and salvation theology.
Since there is a rejection of the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, because of hypothetical cases being exceptions,in hypothetical situations, the bishops with the approval of the pope, allow Catholics to marry Jews and Muslims and do not consider the couples as being in mortal sin.
So we have Amoris Laeititia saying a mortal sin is not aways a mortal sin(301).It is officially acknowledging what has been the practise 'on the ground' for so many years all over the world.
The new theology was used to justify liberal dispensations and annulments This is the practical 'exceptions factory' that we all know of.-Lionel Andrades
6:08 am, April 22, 2016
Lionel,
Your comment above is repugnant and distasteful to me and to the truth. You have no right to judge me and no right to question the Church.
I will let this post stand because Michael Voris is my example of a man. You have lied and misrepresented my past admission which was done out only because I was accused of living in adultery by a man named Julian Barkin on a blog in Toronto. He was a liar then and you are now.
Shame on you
Your comment above is repugnant and distasteful to me and to the truth. You have no right to judge me and no right to question the Church.
I will let this post stand because Michael Voris is my example of a man. You have lied and misrepresented my past admission which was done out only because I was accused of living in adultery by a man named Julian Barkin on a blog in Toronto. He was a liar then and you are now.
Shame on you
_____________________________________
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=20981956&postID=5824235763978048114&isPopup=true
http://voxcantor.blogspot.it/2016/04/bishops-cardinals-faithful-laity-demand.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment