The FSSP/SSPX priests should be asked why should we lay people accept the Letter (1949) with an irrationality and interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism when a rational choice is available.
If due to ignorance the priests are interpreting Vatican Council II and the Letter with a fantasy premise and non traditional conclusion , they will NOT get into trouble with their superiors and the Vatican .
However if they do not use the irrational premise and conclusion there could be restrictions placed on them.
Those priests who intentionally interpret Vatican Council II and the Letter with an error, and are pretending, that Fr. Leonard Feeney was wrong, are really not speaking Catholic truth.They are telling a lie to lay Catholics only to maintain their comfortable life style.
Instead they should clarify that there are no physically visible exceptions to the Fr.Leonard Feeney interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the baptism of desire is not one of them; it is not an exception to EENs.
Ask the priests to have courage and announce the obvious.It is common knowledge, that outside the Catholic Church there cannot be any known salvation, there cannot be known exceptions for human beings.People need to be informed.They should not hide this information only to please their bishop and protect their personal interests.
FSSP and SSPX priests need to know that there is a mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office and Vatican Council II: there is an irrational premisehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/fssp-and-sspx-priests-need-to-know-that.html