Could someone please post three "objectively heretical" statements in the writings of Ratzinger? I would be glad for the education.
It is objectively heretical to assume hypothetical cases are explicit in the present timesd and that these explicit cases are objective exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church for salvation, which is the de fide teaching of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is an objective mistake of Pope Benedict and the consequences are a rejection of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, a change in the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and a rejection of Vatican Council II interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism and the hermeneutic of continuity.This is first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
This heresy can be traced in two papers of the International Theological Commission which was approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. It is there in the recent statement on extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the interview of Pope Benedict published in the daily newspaper Avvenire, before Amoris Laeititia was issued.
Pope Benedict's Avvenire interview contradicts the SSPX General Chapter Statement on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II
When Pope Benedict 'breaks his silence' it usually is to please the Masons?