(25:22)My patron saint ,St.Robert Bellarmine said that union with the Vicar of Christ that is the popè is a sign of Catholic unity.-Dr.Robert Fastiggi
Was Dr.Robert Fastiggi referring to union with the Vicar of Christ who interprets magisterial documents with the theology of Cushingism or Feeneyism ? I assume it is Cushingism.
For me St. Robert Bellarmine was referring to a pope, who was not interpreting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism. He did not create a new premise and inference to change the old ecclesiology.Without the Cushingite new theology we can only interpret the dogma EENS traditionally, like the 16th century missionaries.I call this ecclesiology,Feeneyite.
So Dr.Fastiggi cannot expect Bishop Sanborn to be in unity with the contempory popes who interpret magisterial documents with Cushingism. This is heretical.Bishop Sanborn would be heretical.
If the contemporary popes were Feeneyite, they would be rational, traditional and non heretical.Then Bishop Sanborn could be expected to be in unity with the popes on Catholic doctrine and the dogma EENS.
.Bishop Sanborn is not in union with the Vicar of Christ-Dr.Robert Fastiggi
Yes on doctrine I too do not feel obligated to follow a pope who supports heresy.Bishop Sanborn, like me, has an option .He can avoid the philosophical innovation which is the cause of the heretical conclusion,in doctrine.
However Bishop Sanborn also uses the theology of Cushingism, to interpret the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II.So it is not a black and white issue.
Therefore he is in schism and all of those statements which he made about the danger of schism and that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation apply to him and those who follow him.-Dr.Robert Fastiggi
Is one in schism for rejecting Vatican Council II (Cushingite) or Vatican Council II (Feeneyite)? This needed to be clarified.
The outside the Church there is no salvation refers to an EENS which is Cushingite or Feeneyite?
They do clarify their terms.
St.Robert Bellarmine and St. Augustine were Feeneyite in their ecclesiology as were the popes of their times.The popes since Pius XII to Pope Francis have accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is heretical when it assumes hypothetical cases are practical exceptions to the dogma EENS(Feeneyite).
Both Bishop Sanborn and Dr.Robert Fastiggi accept this heretical interpretation of the second part of the Letter(1949).For both of them hypothetical cases are exceptions to EENS(Feeneyite). This can be seen throughout this video.Since they keep applying this irrational reasoning to both EENS and Vatican Council.They see EENS and Vatican Council II as being Cushingite while for me they are clearly Feeneyite.
Both of them would at times refer to an EENS or a Vatican Council II which is Cushingite or Feeneyite, I could just watch the mix up,sadly.I could see through the mistake they are both making innocently