To have a theology based on nonsense ( hypothetical cases being visible in 2016) and then applying it to salvation theology, the Social Reign of Christ the King, Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed,Tradition...is a little bit too much ?

Boniface has updated his report on Unam Sanctam Catholicam without still discussing any of the philosophical and theological issues raised.1

UPDATE II
Boniface:
After my first update, Lionel posted again, again reiterating the same points. Blah blah blah.

Lionel:

Once again Boniface does not respond on the subject of Catholic philosophy and theology.I don't know why he does not.

I have said hypothetical cases are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Boniface, yes or no. Do you agree with me ?

Why is it so difficult to answer this question ? Yes or no, or any thing more you want to say?

Instead he responds with 'blah, blah, blah'.

Here is a link which explains Boniface's theology. He will not deny it.

Cardinal Muller, Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Fellay's theology is based on hypothetical cases being explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/cardinal-muller-archbishop-di-noia-and.html

_______________________________

Boniface:

Lionel, please learn blogging etiquette and stop posting your spammy, irrelevant comments. I know you don't believe it, but not every article on Catholic Tradition is immediately relevant to EENS, Cardinal Cushing, Feeny, and some letter from 1949.

Lionel:

Boniface's theology is based on hypothetical cases being explicitly known in the present times and so they are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).So EENS, the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and his bishop's understanding of theology is based on this irrationality.

If he does not use this irrational theology, which he considers Catholic, he will not be allowed to offer the Extraordinary Mass in his diocese.

He has to use the new ecclesiology based on theoretical cases; speculative cases (LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 ) being explicit, seen in the flesh, known persons saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.

This will be the theology professed at a conference in Norcia,Italy according to his website.This is all normal for him.

_______________________________

Boniface:

 In fact, I don't even understand what you're argument is because this is so illegible.

Lionel:

It is simple. Hypothetical cases are not explicit for us human beings in 2016.So hypothetical cases ( the baptism of desire (Letter 1949), invincible ignorance(LG 16) cannot be exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

This is basically what I am saying.

________________________________

Boniface:

 I don't know what "problem" you are saying I can't address because I've never bothered to address any of your nonsense. Stop spamming this blog, or learn to post comments relevant to the discussion and actually engage in discussion with other people.

Lionel:

Here is the link.Discuss it.

• Boniface does not say that Muller, Di Noia and Fellay made a mistake, like he does in philosophy ( irrational premise and reasoning) and theology ( new theology based on the irrational premise and conclusion)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/instead-of-saying-muller-di-noia-and.html

_______________________________________

Boniface:

 It's like you only have a single dialogue going in your mind and all you can do is repeat it ad nauseam across the blogosphere. Please go away.

Lionel:

To have a theology based on nonsense ( hypothetical cases being visible in 2016) and then applying it to salvation theology, the Social Reign of Christ the King, Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed,Tradition...is a little bit too much ?

-Lionel Andrades

p.s I am sending this to you so that you can discuss it. You can do so at least once in six years?

1.

http://unamsanctamcatholicam.blogspot.it/2016/06/hey-lionel.html

FEBRUARY 9, 2016

Monastery of St. Benedict in Norcia, Italy interprets St.Thomas and Vatican Council II with an irrationality : bad theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/monastery-of-st-benedict-in-norcia.html

JULY 17, 2015

Prior and monks at the St.Benedict Monastery in Norcia are in doctrinal error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/prior-at-stbenedict-monastery-in-norcia.html

Traditionalists need to overhaul their theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/traditionalists-need-to-overhaul-their.html

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davis, Dietrich Von Hildebrand and other traditionalists allowed the Church to continue on a wrong theological way http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-michael.html

This group of traditionalists instead of correcting the factual error of 1949 consolidated it and did not expose it  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/this-group-of-traditionalists-instead.html