Vatican Council II (Cushingite) has erred but it can be re-interpreted with Feeneyism.Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is not heretical.
So in conclusion I agree with Bishop Robert Sanborn since Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) would be heretical.I also agree with Dr.Robert Fastiggi, since Vatican Council II ( Feneyite) is not heretical.
Bishop Sanborn assumed hypothetical cases were explicit exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS-Feeneyite).Dr.Fastiggi was trying to interpret hypothetical cases as being only hypothetical and so for him they were not exceptions to EENS.So Vatican Council II would be in agreement with St. Robert Bellarmine for him.
I would choose to interpret Vatican Council II like Dr.Fastiggi since it would come across as rational and traditional.Dr.Fastiggi wanted to reconcile Vatican Council II with the past.This desire was strong in him.It was good.
I would also avoid the errors in Vatican Council II (Cushingite) which Bishop Sanborn correctly pointed out.
Vatican Council Ii supports St. Robert Bellamine on outside the Church there is no salvation.It does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors.
I think the two speakers were a good example of dialogue and they helped me to understand, how they think about Vatican Council II and the Church at large.