Saturday, 30 July 2016
Archbishop Lefebvre's Open Letter to Confused Catholics posted on the blog Vox Cantoris did not know of an alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II which had the hermeneutic of continuity and no ambiguity.The Archbishop was correct.Vatican Council II(Cushingite) was a rupture with the past.This was only because he was using the irrational premise and conclusion to interpret the Council II.
This error is the modernism which was overlooked by Archbishop Lefebvre and it is still repeated today by Bishop Bernard Fellay, Bishop Richard Williamson and other bishops and priests of the SSPX
Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with the new theology of Rahner-Ratzinger.
Pope Pius XII, Cardinals Ottaviani, Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre were factually wrong
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was doctrinally wrong his spiritual heirs must admit for a reconciliation with the truth
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Dietrich Von Hildebrand and other traditionalists allowed the Church to continue on a wrong theological way
This group of traditionalists instead of correcting the factual error of 1949 consolidated it and did not expose it
For Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to change the traditional interpretation of the dogma is heretical.To teach a new doctrine is not traditional
Michael Davis, Romano Amerio, Dietrich von Hildebrand were not aware of the irrational premise : Michael Mat, Chris Ferrara, John Rao, James Bogle, Joseph Shaw agree?
David Domet a dissenter?http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/david-domet-dissenter.html
No response from David Domet, Louie Verrecchio and Boniface when I say that they can interpret Vatican Council II with invisible for us LG 16, LG 14 etc being just invisible.That's all