Archbishop Lefebvre's Letter to Confused Catholics indicates he did not know of an alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II which had the hermeneutic of continuity and no ambiguity

Saturday, 30 July 2016

Open Letter to Confused Catholics

http://www.sspxasia.com/Documents/Archbishop-Lefebvre/OpenLetterToConfusedCatholics/

Archbishop Lefebvre's Open Letter to Confused Catholics posted on the blog Vox Cantoris did not know of an alternative interpretation of Vatican Council II which had the hermeneutic of continuity and no ambiguity.The Archbishop was correct.Vatican Council II(Cushingite) was a rupture with the past.This was only because he was using the irrational premise and conclusion to interpret the Council II.

This error is the modernism which was overlooked by Archbishop Lefebvre and it is still repeated today by Bishop Bernard Fellay, Bishop Richard Williamson and other bishops and priests of the SSPX

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/this-error-is-modernism-which-was.html

Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with the new theology of Rahner-Ratzinger.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/archbishop-lefebvre-interpreted-vatican.html

Pope Pius XII, Cardinals Ottaviani, Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre were factually wrong

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/pope-pius-xii-cardinals.html

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was doctrinally wrong his spiritual heirs must admit for a reconciliation with the truth

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-was.html

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Dietrich Von Hildebrand and other traditionalists allowed the Church to continue on a wrong theological way

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-michael.html

This group of traditionalists instead of correcting the factual error of 1949 consolidated it and did not expose it  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/this-group-of-traditionalists-instead.html

For Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to change the traditional interpretation of the dogma is heretical.To teach a new doctrine is not traditional

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/october-24-2014-lionel-barbaralook-at.html

Would you say that was also an oversight of Archbishop Lefebvre ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/would-you-say-that-was-also-oversight.html#links

Michael Davis, Romano Amerio, Dietrich von Hildebrand were not aware of the irrational premise : Michael Mat, Chris Ferrara, John Rao, James Bogle, Joseph Shaw agree?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/michael-davis-romano-amerio-dietrich_11.html

__________________________________________________________

David Domet a dissenter?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/david-domet-dissenter.html

No response from David Domet, Louie Verrecchio and Boniface when I say that they can interpret Vatican Council II with invisible for us LG 16, LG 14 etc being just invisible.That's all

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/no-response-from-david-domet-louie.html