Cardinal Sarah is saying that when you pray and believe during Mass interpret Vatican Council II with a theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and so creates ' a new faith'

(8:26) He ( Cardinal Sarah)  is not saying junk Vatican Council II- Bradley Eli, Church Militant TV.

Lionel: Cardinal Sarah is saying that when you pray and believe during Mass interpret Vatican Council II with a theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction amd so creates ' a new faith'.

He is saying accept the error in the  second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its text,since Vatican Council II does so.

He is saying that in principle accept that hypothetical cases could be known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS),since Vatican Council II has done so.

He is saying assume that those saved in invincible ignorance refer to explicit cases  saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church (Letter of the Holy Office 1949). So Lumen Gentium 14 tells us only those persons need to enter the Church for salvation, who know about the Jesus and the Church.In other words who are not in invincible ignorance.Here we have a non traditional conclusion in Vatican Council II based on an irrational premise.The Council Fathers erred.This is how Cardinal Sarah wants us to interpret Vatican Council II at Mass, even though there is a rational and traditional choice.

He is not saying the lay man should receive the Eucharist on his knees and the priest should face east during the Mass and affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS in line with Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.

He is not saying to reject the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and accept only the first part, since the Council Fathers and the magisterium in Rome since the 1949 had made a mistake.

He is not saying that assume hypothetical cases are just hypothetical.Do not make the mistake of the Council Fathers who assumed hypothetical cases were explicit. So they concluded that there was salvation outside the Church.

Cardinal Sarah did not say that a Catholic's ecclesiology during Mass , should be Feeneyite and not Cushingite.

He is not saying that Vatican Council II has erred.It overlooked a factual error and then built a fantasy theology upon it, to reject Tradition.The objective error indicates that this cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.The Council with the Cushingite theology is the work of human error and it has changed the understanding of the people during Mass, on what does the Catholic Church still teach.

-Lionel Andrades