Cardinal Sarah is saying that when you pray and believe during Mass interpret Vatican Council II with a theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and so creates ' a new faith' I mentioned in a previous blog post.
He is saying accept the error in the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in its text,since Vatican Council II does so.
He means in principle accept that hypothetical cases could be known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),since Vatican Council II has done so.
So it is ' a new faith' for Catholics during Mass since the 1950's.
This is the way he approves ' a new faith' during Mass in all the rites.
He first starts with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,which is a foundational dogma for other doctrines of the Catholic Church.
He assumes there are known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, all needing faith and the baptism of water.He means there are objective cases of persons who are saved,who did not need faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.
This is the innovation. This is the new premise which he brings into the Church.
So there is lex orandi, lex credendi and lex vivendi with the use of this irrational premise.There is a new theology, based on this irrationality.It is a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.
He has a new theology which says every one needs to enter the Church but some people do not.He affirms the dogma EENS ,which does not mention any exceptions, and he also alleges that there are exceptions.
It is only be supposing that there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS, (even though there cannot be known cases of people saved without the baptism of waterin the Church) that he is able to present exceptions to the defined dogma which does not mention any exceptions.
So he will point out to Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 on extra ecclesam nulla salus, which is a defined dogma, and he will claim that he believes in it. At the same time he will allege that since there are known exceptions to the dogma; since there are known cases of non persons saved outside the Church, every one does not need to enter the Church.This is contrary to the Principle of Non Contradiction. How can it be said all need to enter but some do not.
It is with this new theology that he interprets Vatican Council II, as does Church Militant TV, the Latin Mass Society, Fr.Serafino Lanzetta F.I and the Franciscans of the Immaculate,the Remnant and Wanderer newspaper staff, the New Catechumenale Way and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes.
This new theology is based on philosophical subjectivism i.e we can allegedly see and know personal cases of the baptism of desire and blood or being saved in invincible ignorance all without the baptism of water.This was the deadly premise which derailed traditional theology in the Catholic Church.
The premise is false.Since objectively we cannot judge or know who will be saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.There are is no such case,in the past or present. We physically cannot meet any one as such on the streets. We cannot see any such person in 2016 with the naked eye. If such a case exists it would only be known to God.
So once this premise was accepted by the magisterium in the 1949 Fr. Leonard Feeney Case, it created a new salvation theology for the Church. This new salvation theology says there are objecive, personally known exceptions to the traditional understanding of EENS.So all do not need to enter the Church. So the 16th century missionaries salvation theology had become obsolete.
It was is this fantasy theology,being able to see people in Heaven without the baptism of water, which violated the Principle of Non Contradiction and the Council Fathers accepted during Vatican Council II.The magisterium did not object.
So Vatican Council II mentions being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) or the desire for the baptism of water of a hypothetical case of a catechumen(LG 14) based on the false premise of there being known cases of persons in these two categories.This was a mistake in the text of Vatican Council.
There would be a further mistake in the interpretation, when Cardinal Sarah and every body else, assumes that LG 14( catechumen with a desire for the baptism of water) and LG 16( someone saved in invincible ignorance) refer to known cases in the present times, and so they are exceptions to the dogma EENS and the old ecclesiology.
So cardinal Sarah would interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma EENS and the old ecclesiology.Every one would not need to enter the Church for salvation.It is with this theology that there is a lex orandi, lex credendi and lex vivendi.
Based on the new premise, which contradicts our understanding of reality( we humans in general cannot see people in Heaven) we now have ' a new faith' during Holy Mass.The Nicene Creed which says, 'I believe in one baptism( known) for the forgiveness of sins' now means 'I believe in three or more baptisms, without water.'They are the baptism of desire and blood, being saved in invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word (AG 11) etc'.The Athanasius Creed which begins and ends saying outside the Church there is no salvation,was put away with the new premise.
So when Cardinal Sarah says that the priest should face the East and communicants must kneel, he means this must be done at Mass where the priest and congregation,interpret Vatican Council II with a new theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and so creates ' a new faith'.