Thursday, July 28, 2016

Theological bankruptcy

Cardinal Burke and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf are not speaking with clarity.They need to say that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church and that Vatican Council II says this. I repeat Vatican Council II says so.

I mentioned in a previous blog post  1 that they need to tell all non Catholics that the Church teaches in Vatican Council II, that they need faith and baptism to avoid Hell.This is the teaching of the Church in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church,the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors, all interpreted with hypothetical cases being hypothetical, with LG 16 being invisible and not visible, with LG 8, UR 3 etc referring to implicit and not explicit cases and NA 2 referring to cases explicit only for God and hypothetical for us humans.

Also the blogs  Unam Sanctam Catholicam, AKA Catholic and Vox Cantoris do not interpret Vatican Council II's Lumen Gentium16(LG 16), Unitatis Reintigratio 3(UR 3) etc as invisible cases. I know that LG 16 etc is unknown to us and known only to God in 2016.However it is not so for these bloggers who will not change their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II (LG 16, UR 3 etc).Since this is the official position of the SSPX. They are obligated.For the SSPX  LG 16 etc  refer to visible,explicit and personally known persons in 2016.So Vatican Council II contradicts the traditional teaching on other religions.

Image result for Photo of Boniface at Unam Sanctam Catholicam
AKA Catholic(Louie Verrecchio) refers  to false religions but does not state that Vatican Council II considers other religions as false,even hypothetically, and unknown only to God, they could have good and holy things.There could be elements of sanctification and truth, seeds of the Word etc even though their members are oriented to Hell without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14).

Unam Sanctam Catholicam( Boniface) will not say that Vatican Council II calls for responding to the Great Commission.Since non Catholics need faith and baptism(AG 7, LG 14) for salvation.Most people on earth are oriented to Hell since they die without faith and baptism.He does not interpret Vatican Council II in this way.It is as if he feels obligated to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Image result for Photo of Domet Vox Cantoris
Vox Cantoris(Domet) says there are mistakes in Vatican Council II but he will not be precise.He does not state that the reference to the baptism of desire (BOD) and bein saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) in Vatican Council II was a mistake.Since there are no known cases of someone saved with BOD and I.I with or without the baptism of water. BOD(LG 14) and I.I ( LG 16) are superflous references. They cannot be relevant or exceptions  to the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of the EENS.Since they do not physically exist on earth in 2016. This is the specific mistake in the text of Vatican Council II which Vox does not point out.

The three of them, Verrecchio, Domet and Vox do not want to be considered Feeneyite.Here is the problem.They do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and traditionally.If they refer to physically not known LG 16 etc, it would mean there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II, to the old ecclesiology and interpretation of EENS.Vatican Council II would then not contradict the 16th centuries missionaries on EENS.They would contradict Pope Benedict XVI in the interview with Avvenire.He said there were developments. He meant physically visible LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 for example, are explicit exceptions to EENS.
Instead the three bloggers are repeating the error of Pope Benedict and the present magisterium.It was also the error of Archbishop Lefebvre.
So this week there has been no critical statement on other religions,as not being paths to salvation according to Vatican Council II.
Image result for Photo of Pope francis and Pope Benedict
Verrecchio, Domet and Boniface with the new theology represent the liberal position on this issue. They may be traditionalists on other aspects of the Faith but they are supporting the new liberal theology of Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.
I avoiding this new theology.I interpret Vatican Council II  in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.There is no strict interpretation of EENS for the three of them, since BOD and I.I refer to physically visible cases in 2016.
If they do make the correction it would be a rupture with the SSPX on Vatican Council II and EENS.

It has been a long time now. I have been asking them if LG 16 refers to explicit or implicit cases.It is a reference to someone personally known or unknown? Are these objectively visible or a hypothetical cases ? They will not answer.I assume they know the answer.They also know the theological consequences of what they will be saying.
It means the SSPX has made a doctrinal mistake as has the Vatican Curia.

There cannot be a know case of someone saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) or with the baptism of desire(LG 14) in 2016.-Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Burke and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf are not speaking with clarity.It needs to be said that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Church and Vatican Council II says this. I repeat Vatican Council II says so

No comments: