We need an exit from Vatican Council II intepreted with an irrational premise and conclusion and which is fantasy theology based on hypothetical cases being living men and women on earth, even though they are allegedly in Heaven. With all this nonsense theology Massimo Faggioli is calling for a Brexit which will be 'a refiguration of the Catholic Church' according to Masonic principles supported by Satan.1.
In a previous blog post 2 I wrote that Massimo Faggioli interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.He is aware that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism.However this would be politically incorrect with the Left and for him.
So doctrine and truth in the Church is not a priority for him.Instead his political affiliation with the Left decides how Vatican Council II is interpreted.
There are two different ecclesiologies. One is Feeneyite and the other is Cushingite.A Feeneyite interpretation of EENS would be rejected by Massimo Faggioli, whose wrtings are part of the Ecclesiology curriculum in Rome's pontifical universities.
The Feeneyite interpretation of Vatican Council II would be saying that all non Catholics, including most immigrants, are on the way to Hell,without 'faith and baptism'. This would be going back to the old ecclesiology on salvation.So in a pluralist society we would be saying that the Catholic Church teaches in Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) that the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church is still exclusivist.
Faggioli and his friends, who have been critical of Ross Douthet, are Cushingites(and so is Douthet).So the re-interpretation of Aquinas and Augustine's ecclesiology would also be Cushingite.Aquinas and Augustine can be also be interpreted with Feeneyism by assuming the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to invisible for us cases.This would be a Brexit from the nonsense theology being imposed on Catholics by the contemporary magisterium and liberal theologians like Faggioli.
With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) we are back to the old ecclesiology and the old interpretation of the dogma EENS. It was upon this old ecclesiology, that Catholics affirmed that all political laws must have as its center Jesus Christ as known in the Catholic Church. So there can be no separation of Church and State which is acceptable.
This would be anathema for Faggioli and those who finance the magazine Commonweal.With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) the narrative changes. We can call for a separation of secularism and State.Give us a break, a Brexit from the new theology based on philosophical subjectivism.This is used as a ruse to change traditional salvation theology.
Catholicism is still the same when the Cushingite mistake is avoided.Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) would be a kind of Brexit. It would be calling for an exit from Vatican Council II(Cushingite).
The traditionalists, and all Catholics, can affirm the exclusivist eccclesiolgy and also accept Vatican Council II and EENs.This is the Catholic Faith before and after Vatican Council II.
They can live this traditional theology, traditional Catholicism, even in a new order.They can continue to work for the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Vatican Council II and EENS being only Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades
They can live this traditional theology, traditional Catholicism, even in a new order.They can continue to work for the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Vatican Council II and EENS being only Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades
1.
2.
July 3, 2016
There must be Catholic internationalism based on an ecclesiology which is the same before and after Vatican Council II
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment