Cardinal Sarah is stll offering Holy Mass Ad Orientem and with the theology of EENS ( Cushingite), Vatican Council II (Cushingite), Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite) and the Nicene Creed ( Cushingite).
This Advent he could offer Holy Mass with the theology of EENS ( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II( Feeneyite), Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) and the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite) and ask the rest of the Church to also do the same.
Presently Cardinal Sarah offers Mass facing East and interprets Vatican Council II with a new premise which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.It supports a 'new faith' in the Catholic Church.
Cardinal Robert Sarah inteprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality and so there is a rupture with the old ecclesiology associated with the Traditional Latin Mass.The same rupture is there when the FSSP and SSPX offer the Latin Mass, because of the New Theology, based on the irrationality, which is used by them to interpret magisterial documents.
Since the liturgy has been made ideological a large section of priests of the Franciscans of the Immaculate are not allowed to offer the Tridentine Rite Mass whose ancient ecclesiology affirmed an EENS ( Feeneyite) and a Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite).
When I attend Mass in the vernacular or in Latin I affirm EENS ( Feeneyite), Vatican Council II( Feeneyite), Catechism of the Catholic Church( Feeneyite) and the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite). Since I do not affirm EENS( Cushingite) I can also affirm the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.Cardinal Sarah cannot do this. Since for him there is known salvation outside the Church. He interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism.
The ecclesiology of Cardinal Sarah at Mass is a rupture with that of the 16th century missionaries when they offered Holy Mass. They affirmed EENS and the Nicene Creed with Feeneyism( no known exceptions to EENS) while for Cardinal Sarah there are exceptions to EENS and the Nicene Creed.
Could Cardinal Sarah confirm or deny what I have written here?
Cardinal Robert Sarah has still not sorted out the issue of the two faiths during Mass, one with the theology of their being known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the other which omits this irrationality
Cardinal Sarah means the priest should face east,communicants kneel and all interpret Vatican Council II with a new premise which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and creates ' a new faith'
If you speak to Cardinal Robert Sarah he will say that he rejects Feeneyism. So he interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism.
Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate have to continue to suffer because of the liturgy becoming ideological
FFI priests ask Cardinal Robert Sarah if A is in conflict with B for him
Cardinal Robert Sarah and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary
Vatican Council II has an error : secular journalists, cardinals and bishops don't know what to do
Cardinal Sarah and Bishop Schneider do not confess the Catholic Faith when they deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
So why cannot Cardinal Sarah attend Mass like I do?
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Baptism of Desire. It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance. This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Council of Florence.One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.
Liberal theologians.They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.
Vatican Council II(Cushingite). It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.
Baltimore Catechism. It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.
Catechism of Pope X. It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite). It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite) .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite).It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to tormally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite).CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite).CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.
Lionel: He affirms Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) and , is waiting for the rest of the Church to follow.
John Martignoni: The American Catholic apologist.He says the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to 'zero cases' in our reality. So they are not exceptions to EENS.
Fr.S.Visintin osb: He is the Dean of Theology at the St.Anselm Pontifical University in Rome.He agrees with Martignoni.