Neither the SSPX or FSSP priests offers the Tridentine Rite Mass as it was offered in pre- Council of Trent times.Since they interpret Catholic doctrine with the new theology.
The new theology is a break with the old ecclesiology based on the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So at the Latin Mass in 2016 we have the liturgical form but not the ancient theology and Catholic doctrines.
For all of them there are exceptions to the traditional salvation theology associated with the 16th century missionaries, when they offered the Latin Mass.
So even for the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary , the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the USA, the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past.Their position is the same as the SSPX and FSSP priests in Rome.
I mentioned in the blog post yesterday (August 21,2016) that I went for Holy Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome.Father Aldo Rossi the SSPX Prior in Albano, Italy offered it at 11 a.m.There was no denial or clarificatin from him or the SSPX,Italy on my report,'SSPX has changed dogmas and doctrine'
The SSPX ecclesiology is Cushingite while mine is Feeneyite like that of the times of St. Teresa of Avila.
The SSPX has changed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the doctrines related to EENS e.g Social reign of Christ the King. They have changed the Nicene Creed and rejected the Athanasius Creed with their Cushingite new theology.
They claim to affirm Cantante Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 on EENS ( Feeneyite).At the same time they affirm the baptism of desire ( Cushingite).
At the Latin Mass they recite the Nicene Creed which says and means ' I believe in one baptism for the forgivness of sins' .However theologically they mean three or more known baptisms.Most of them are without the baptism of water.
They say Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition and mean it is a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).Yet it is an EENS which in reality they do not affirm.
They say they affirm the Syllabus of Errors but the Syllabus of Errors was based on the old ecclesiology and the foundation of the old ecclesiology was EENS ( Feeneyite).The ecclesiology of the Syllabus of Errors was not EENS ( Cushingite).
For Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Pierpaolo Petrucci and the SSPX priests in Italy Lumen Gentium 14 ( catechumen saved without the baptism of water) and Lumen Gentium 16 ( saved in invincible ignorance without the baptism of water) is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.LG 14 and LG 16 refer to explicit cases.So they are relevant and exceptions to EENS( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors.
Their position is complicated and heretical that Don Aldo Rossi had nothing to say yesterday morning. He probably intended well but did not know from where to start.
However I have been saying the same things for the last three years.
Assuming he understands what I am saying is he going to say that the SSPX, FSSP, magisterium and liberals were wrong all these years?
It would be the end for him in the SSPX, if he did it alone.
He cannot constantly affirm a simple thing like we cannot physically see people in Heaven or earth saved with the baptism of water.He agrees with me when I talk to him. Then he goes back and talks to the others and changes his opinion.
How can you be confused on this ? It is fact of life that we cannot see the soul of a person.