Wednesday, August 3, 2016

The SSPX is interpreting LG 16 as being physically visible for us. If they assume it is invisible for us, Vatican Council II changes.The reconciliation process with the Vatican changes

Comments from the blog The Eponymous Flower : Archbishop Pozzo: Bishop Fellay to Accept Personal Prelature Arrangement

susan August 3, 2016 at 5:03 AM
so you're a calvanist....clearly...
Lionel:
I am saying that such a person would only be known to God. We cannot see any person's soul saved as such. So to suggest that this person is known to you personally and so is an exception to the dogma EENS contradicts the Church Fathes, popes and saints on EENS. It contradict Jesus in John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.

Calvinists? Susan, even the Calvinists, Baptists and non Christians know your referring to a hypothetical case.


__________________________

WE are most certainly bound by the Sacraments; God is not...
Lionel: According to the dogma EENS without faith and baptism at the time of death, a person is oriented to Hell. This has been the traditional teaching of the Church over the centuries.If there is someone saved without faith and baptism in the Church because God is not bound to Sacraments it would be unknown to us. So you are saying that these unknown cases are known and so are relevant to EENS?

____________________________

I have no desire to 'call up'...

Lionel: Call up someone who has not been conditioned into believeing hypothetical cases are known exceptions in 2016 to the dogma EENS.

I am sorry that the SSPX priest at the chapel you go to cannot help you with this and neither can Louie Verrecchio. Since it is a common sense question. It is common knowledge, known to all people, that we cannot see the soul of someone in Heaven.


_____________________________

EWTN is a protestant mess...
Lionel: Which Fathers of the Church? None of them said the desire for the baptism of water of that famous unknown catechism is an exception to the dogma EENs. You have to infer that it is an exception.

Then we come to Vatican Council II. It is only by making this wrong inference that Vatican Council II is a break with EENS.

I make the explicit-implicit, visible-invisible distinction and choose invisible for us baptism of desire. You unknowlingly choose visible for us baptism of desire.

Then you assume that visible for us baptism of desire(LG 16) is an exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS, as it was known to the 16th century missionaries in the Catholic Church.

So this is not the teaching of the Catholic Church. It is an innovation approved by the liberals.

_______________________________

And Lionel, I say this in all sincerity and Charity; ...
Lionel: But when are you going to enter the discussion,when will you discus particular points. ? I am saying BOD can be explicit or implicit what are you saying about it? Nothing!
I am saying LG 16 can be visible or invisible in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.What are you saying about this ? Nothing.
Sorry Susan, you mean well and your a good person but we still have not begun a discussion.

__________________________________

A normal, healthy reaction is to wish the other well...
Lionel: The SSPX is interpreting LG 16 as being physically visible for us. If they assume it is invisible for us, Vatican Council II changes.The reconciliation process with the Vatican changes.It is the SSPX then which will doctrinally be in a sure position.So this is an important issue!
-Lionel Andrades



Now it is being asked who was this catechumen who was originally saved without the baptism of water which he desired before death ? How could there be a known case? How could any one know of any one who is saved without the baptism of water ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/now-it-is-being-asked-who-was-this.html

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/now-it-is-being-asked-who-was-this.html

No comments: