Can the FSSP priests in Dallas and Detroit see someone saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire with or without the baptism of water in 2016?
Can they know of any exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
Can they say that when the saints referred to the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance they meant visible cases ?
Could any one in the past have seen someone go to Heaven with the baptism of desire or blood and without the baptism of water?
No one could physically see any such case.
So how can the FSSP priests change the Nicene Creed to mean 'I believe in three or more baptisms without the baptism of water.They are desire, blood,invincible ignorance...'?
How can they assume that LG 16 in Vatican Council II refers to a known case and so it is an exception to EENS( Feeneyite)?
The FSSP priests are proclaiming a falsehood to maintain their careers and not be suspended for supporting Feeneyism, which has been the theology of the Catholic Church for centuries.They are politically correct and so they are given canonical status.