Recognise the error in Vatican Council II.Avoid it.Affirm Vatican Council II with the New Theology.
Affirm Tradition without assuming Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8 etc are visible instead of invisible in 2016.In this way you stay clear of the New Theology.
Tell the liberals that you are a traditionalist who affirms Vatican Council II with the New Theology.You are a traditionalist who supports the old ecclesiology in harmony with Vatican Council II ( interpreted without the irrational premise).
You are a Feeneyite.So you have a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II comes with the New Theology which is based on an irrationality(invisible cases are visible).
The two popes and the Vatican Curia affirm the New Theology, the irrational Cushingite theology and interpret Vatican Council II with this innovation.So the conclusion is non-traditional as would be expected.
Vatican Council II for Cushingites emerges as a rupture with Tradition.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church,interpreted with the New Theology, creates a rupture with Tradition.Avoid the New Theology and these magisterial documents are seen with a different perspective.It's simple and easy. It seems too good to be true. This is the missing link.We have found it after some 50-plus years of confusion.
Without the Cushingite theology, without the New Theology based on an irrational premise and conclusion ,Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity.
So ask the popes to interpret a Vatican Council II in which :-
1.Hypothetical cases are only hypothetical and not explicit.
2.Hypothetical cases are not assumed to be objectively visible so there is no violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.
The New Theology is a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.
The New Theology is a violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.
3.Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintingration 3 etc refer to invisible, imaginary cases in 2016. They are theoretical and hypothetical for us. They are not objectively seen and known in the present times.So they do not contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The dogma in the pre-Conciliar Church is the same as it was for the 16th century missionaries.Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.
So change the liberal-secular image of what it means to be a traditionalist and accept Vatican Council II. Affirm that all Catholics need to formally convert into the Church, all need to be incorporated into the Church as members, for salvation.Cite Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14).Cardinal Angelo Amato has called for Catholic mission based on AG 7 and LG 14.Traditional mission doctrine based on Vatican Council II.All non Catholics are oriented to the fires of Hell in 2016 and there can be no known exceptions.
Affirm the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is Feeneyite.Reject the second part of the Letter which contradicts the first part.It is Cushingite. It uses a false premise and conclusion.It is the basis of the New Theology.The New Theology comes to us from the error in the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the liberal Archbishop of Boston.
See here are passages from Vatican Council II. I accept the part in red and blue.The passages in red do not contradict those in blue for me, since I avoid the irrational premise. I do not assume they refer to known and objective cases in the present times. I accept them as being hypothetical. In this way I revert to the old theology and the old ecclesiology and of course avoid the New Theology which has grown from the 1949 Marchetti Letter to the Archbishop of Boston.
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching,
and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is
His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of
faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the
necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.
Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus
Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter
into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to
Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith
without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6)...- Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic
faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the
Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ,
present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the
unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of
faith and baptism and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church,
for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever,
therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would
refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved...
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be
incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With
love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
This is the one Church of Christ which in the Creed is professed as one,
holy, catholic and apostolic, which our Saviour, after His Resurrection,
commissioned Peter to shepherd, and him and the other apostles to extend and
direct with authority, which He erected for all ages as "the pillar and
mainstay of the truth".This Church constituted and organized in the world
as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the
successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him, although many
elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible
structure. These elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ, are
forces impelling toward catholic unity. -Lumen Gentium 8, Vatican Council II.
3. Even in the beginnings of this one and only Church of God there arose certain rifts,(19) which the Apostle strongly condemned. But in subsequent centuries much more serious dissensions made their appearance and quite large communities came to be separated from full communion with the Catholic Church - for which, often enough, men of both sides were to blame. The children who are born into these Communities and who grow up believing in Christ cannot be accused of the sin involved in the separation, and the Catholic Church embraces upon them as brothers, with respect and affection. For men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect. The differences that exist in varying degrees between them and the Catholic Church - whether in doctrine and sometimes in discipline, or concerning the structure of the Church - do indeed create many obstacles, sometimes serious ones, to full ecclesiastical communion. The ecumenical movement is striving to overcome these obstacles. But even in spite of them it remains true that all who have been justified by faith in Baptism are members of Christ's body, and have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church.
Moreover, some and even very many of the significant elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church itself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church: the written word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit, and visible elements too. All of these, which come from Christ and lead back to Christ, belong by right to the one Church of Christ.-Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Vatican Council II
3. Even in the beginnings of this one and only Church of God there arose certain rifts,(19) which the Apostle strongly condemned. But in subsequent centuries much more serious dissensions made their appearance and quite large communities came to be separated from full communion with the Catholic Church - for which, often enough, men of both sides were to blame. The children who are born into these Communities and who grow up believing in Christ cannot be accused of the sin involved in the separation, and the Catholic Church embraces upon them as brothers, with respect and affection. For men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect. The differences that exist in varying degrees between them and the Catholic Church - whether in doctrine and sometimes in discipline, or concerning the structure of the Church - do indeed create many obstacles, sometimes serious ones, to full ecclesiastical communion. The ecumenical movement is striving to overcome these obstacles. But even in spite of them it remains true that all who have been justified by faith in Baptism are members of Christ's body, and have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church.
Moreover, some and even very many of the significant elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church itself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church: the written word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit, and visible elements too. All of these, which come from Christ and lead back to Christ, belong by right to the one Church of Christ.-Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Vatican Council II
The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men. Indeed, she proclaims, and ever must proclaim Christ "the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6), in whom men may find the fullness of religious life, in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself.-Nostra Aetate 2, Vatican Council II
Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures. All should see to it, then, that in catechetical work or in the preaching of the word of God they do not teach anything that does not conform to the truth of the Gospel and the spirit of Christ. -Nostra Aetate 4, Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment