Why are they given canonical status when they reject Feeneyism which is rational, traditional and without the new theology based on being able to see what is invisible.

For Cardinal Raymond Burke Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a person/people saved in invincible ignorance without the baptism of water and so LG 16 is an explicit, 'seen' exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So he rejects Feeneyism and supports the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

For me LG 16 refers to an invisible case.It is something not seen. So LG 16 is not an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite). The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake.

So for Cardinal Burke all Muslims and Jews do not need to formally enter the Church in 2016 since there are known exceptions; seen exceptions.This is irrational.

For me Vatican Council II(AG 7,LG 14) says all need faith and baptism for salvation; all need to enter the Church in 2016 and there cannot be any known exception,since exceptions cannot be seen.

Cardinal Raymond Burke like the FSSP priests are negating the traditional teaching on mission based on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and yet are allowed to be incardinated, are granted canonical status and not considered canonically heretical.With an irrationality they have re-interpreted Vatican Council II, the Nicene Creed, the dogma EENS, the Catechism of the Catholic Church etc.

I do not do so and they cannot correct me or point out where I am wrong.Since I am rational and traditional and they are not.

Why are they given canonical status when they reject Feeneyism which is rational, traditional and without the new theology based on being able to see what is invisible.-Lionel Andrades

SEPTEMBER 2, 2016

Some things can be seen or not seen, agreed ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/some-things-can-be-seen-or-not-seen.html