Wednesday, September 28, 2016

With this new theology the Principle of Non Contradiction has been violated. There are two teachings in the Church. One is orthodox and the other ambigous. One is rational and the other is irrational.

The infallible teaching of the Church referred to in Vatican Council II contradicts Catholic Answers. The Church infallibly taught in in three Church Councils that the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus meant all need to be incorporated into the Church as members.This was de fide.I call this extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyism). 
This is rejected by the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and also Catholic Answers. We now have a new doctrine. It is extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cushingite- all need to enter the Church except for some who do not need to enter the Church).
So there is a change in faith.
With this new theology the Principle of Non Contradiction has been violated. There are two teachings in the Church. One is orthodox and the other ambigous. One is rational and the other is irrational.
For instance, I affirm EENS ( Feeneyite - no known exceptions to EENS) and for Catholic Answers it is EENS ( Cushingite- there are known exceptions to EENS Feeneyite).
I affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite-LG 16 are not visible but invisible cases) and for Catholic Answers ( LG 16 etc refer to invisible cases and so LG 16 is an exception to EENS Feeneyite).
I affirm the Nicene Creed ( there is one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, one known baptism). Catholic Answers changes the Nicene Creed to ( I beleive in three or more known baptisms, and they include the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible all without the baptism of water.There are exceptions). For me this is a first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
Similarly I interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism while Catholic Answers does it with irrational and innovative Cushingism.It is magisterial in the present times.The present 'Church' has approved this heresy which is a break with the pre-Council of Trent magisterium. It was done with a new theology.The present Church( with the Baltimore Catechism) has changed the teachings of the past Church ( before the Council of Trent). The change was made with a theology based on an objective error.
So the SSPX and the sedevacantists who affirm the traditional teachings of the Church reject the innovation which has been accepted by Catholic Answers and the present magisterium. These are decisions of "the Church", " our mother".The SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 affirmed the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS. The CDF/Ecclesia Dei refuses to  accept this teaching on faith.Teaching on faith and morals? A de fide teaching has been changed.
Central to this problem is still extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the injustice done to Fr.Leonard Feeney. 

-Lionel Andrades

No comments: