FEENEYITE EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IS CONSISTENT WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II AND THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
These statements are consistent with the understanding of the Church contained in the documents of Vatican II, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church
I can affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) according to the 16th century missionaries and the three Church Councils which defined EENS without rejecting invisible for us and known only to God being saved in invincible ignorance.
Secondly, in 2016 I cannot meet or see someone saved in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, who would be an exception or relevant to the traditional Feeneyite interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
All in 2016 need to be card carrying members of the Church, as Fr.Leonard Feeney and the popes and saints taught, and we cannot know of an exception.
If someone allegedly died without the baptism of water in the past he or she cannot be an exception to the dogma in 2016 since it would not be an explicit case. For someone to be an exception, the person would have to exist. 'Zero case's cannot be exceptions to EENS, said the apologist John Martignoni.
So what I am saying here is consistent with Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846,1257). It is consistent with hypothetical-for-us LG 16,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc.