Comment on Gloria TV
It is true that there have been unholy fruits from Vatican Council II. However you mean Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism as a theology. You mean a Vatican Council II interpreted with a false prremise of being able to see or know people in the present times saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So the conclusion is non traditional.
This false interpretation of Vatican Council II cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
However inspite of this general error Vatica Council II can be interpreted without the false premise of the baptism of desire etc being visible in 2016.
If we go back to the interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney then pastorally,as one clear thinking commentators at Gloria TV said, Vatican Council II will have the hermeneutic of continuity.It is this Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which in future will bring forth good fruit.