Until Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider affirm Feeneyism as a salvation theology they will not be able to interpret Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity.Vatican Council II will continue to be a rupture with Tradition.
They must first say to themself that we humans cannot know of a person saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water in 2016.This is something obvious.
Then they must say to themself that there are no known cases of persons saved 'in imperfect communion with the Church'(UR 3) or 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 9) etc in 2016. These are hypothetical and theoretical cases.
So every one needs to be incorporated into the Church with 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14) and there are no known exceptions in 2016.There are no known exceptions to AG 7 and LG 14 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as interpreted by the 16th century missionaries.
Once this is clear they are back to the old ecclesiology.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not contradict the ecclesiology of the Syllabus of Errors.
Vatican Council II is traditional.
It is the liberals who will be in a fix. They will not have any citations in Vatican Council II to support their non traditional position.Now they can do so since they mix up what is hypothetical as being objectively known in 2016.
A Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage in being held in Rome, which was originally planned for Norcia. All the participants interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus not with traditional Feeneyiism but innovative Cushingism. For them people in Heaven are assumed to be known in the present times who are saved without the baptism of water and they are physically visible on earth to be known exceptions to the traditional intepretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation.This is the dogma associated with the old ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass.-Lionel Andrades