Sunday, November 20, 2016

Bad philosophy and irrational theology even after informing them


Hilary White does not realize that the liberals and dissenters can use her same logic to reach different conclusions.It is the premise which is important.
Hilary White says: Things I thank God for:
That there is such a thing as the logical principle of non-contradiction
For Hilary White and the liberals the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
For me it is not an exception.Since my premise is different from her.

That “a thing and its opposite cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time.”
Hilary White thinks it is true that the baptism of desire exists without the baptism of water and it is known to human beings in the present times.
For me it does not exist in our reality. So my conclusion would be different from hers.

That “A thing is that thing and not some other thing”.
For her the baptism of desire is a thing.It is real.
It is not so for me.

That “each thing is the same with itself and different from another”
The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is the same 'with itself' and 'different from another' very concrete case for her.
Not for me.

That “things which equal the same thing also equal one another,”
That A = A

The baptism of desire etc is equal to a real person in the present times for her. A=A.
This is not true for me.

That “tertium non datur” – for any proposition, either that proposition is true, or its negation is true.
For the baptism of desire refers to a known case.She has not denied this on her blog but only deleted the last post I sent her.This is all probably out of her philosophical concepts.

That “To say of what is that it is not, or of what is not that it is, is false”
Her philosofical position is false since there is no known baptism of desire. It is upon this irrational she builds her new theology, Rahner's theology.

That there is no “third way” between true and not true.
Here I have showed how we both have different premises and so reach different conclusions. Though both of us think we are rational one of us I think is violating the Principle of Non Contradiction.
Based upon this violation of the Principle of Non Contraduction a new theory, a new theology has been created.This is the official theology of the magisterium and the traditionalists.

That there are fundamental axiomatic rules upon which rational discourse itself is based.
I find  this terribly funny given our situation.

That it is possible to know that some things are true and some things not true.
Look at the issue of salvation in the Catholic Church. She and I are looking at it differently.

That it is possible to discover which is which.
It is with this hope that I keep writing about this and sending blog posts to her.

That yes means yes and no means no and that there is a difference between them.
The premise decides what is the conclusion. Presently the whole Church, educated Catholics included, are saying Yes to an irrational premise, which makes Vatican Council II a break with Tradition.
Many of them have been informed and yet they choose the irrational premise, Hilary included.

That there is a difference between here and there, that up is not the same as down
So why is she assuming baptism of desire cases which are up there in Heaven if they exist, are down here on earth and are exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?

That there is such a thing as distinctions and differences.
That reality is a thing.

What reality is she talking about on the issue of salvation in the Catholic Church? -Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 20, 2016

No surprise that the earthquake at Norcia destroyed the church which was a centre for the pro-Rahner Catholic traditionalists on the feast of Christ the King celebrated according to the Traditional Latin Mass calendar: bad philosophy irrational theology

No comments: