Can the SSPX accept Vatican Council II like the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to get canonical status ? : No one tells the pope that he is interpreting Vatican Council II with bad philosophy and bad theology which has now been exposed

It seems that in the Apostolic Letter Misericordia et Misera Pope Francis still wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with an irrational premise to get a non traditional conclusion and only then they will be granted full communion. And no points out the error. No one shows him his philosophical and theological irrationality.

No one tells him that he is interpreting Vatican Council II with bad philosophy and bad theology which has now been exposed.

It is with this irrational interpretation of the Council that there is a break with Tradition and he wants the SSPX to accept the same.

May be for political reasons the cardinals and bishops at the Ecclesia Dei,Vatican keep quiet but where is the rest of the Catholic Church?

Without this irrational interpretation of the Council there is no break with Tradition.Would the pope accept this ?

Without this irrational interpretation of the Council there is no break with Tradition and can the SSPX be allowed to affirm it? Can all Catholics be allowed to affirm  it?

Would the Jewish Left rabbis object if the FSSP priests,for example, say that they accept Vatican Council II without the false premise( the baptism of desire cases are physically visible) and inference( they are visible exceptions to all needing to be incorporated into the Church for salvation) ?

Would the pope object if the Sisters of the Franciscans of the Immaculate say that they reject the Rahnerian theology in Vatican Council II ?

They have already said that they accept Vatican Council II but without the Rahnerian theology.So Vatican Council II would not conflict with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)? Can the SSPX say the same?
Can the traditionalists at the St.Benedict Centers,USA say that they affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, according to Fr. Leonard Feeney which they have always defended?

For the two popes can Vatican Council II be in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors and the EENS according to the 16th century missionaries?

No one is officially asking the two popes this.

-Lionel Andrades