Do you think that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was using Cushingism instead of Feeneyism?

Do you think that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre also made a mistake in theology and lost the truth?

Lionel:

Do you think that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was using Cushingism instead of Feeneyism?

______________________________

Cardinal Ratzinger and Archbishop Lefebvre did not know : with Feeneyism Vatican Council II affirms an Ecumenism of Return, Social Reign of Christ the King and no known salvation outside the Church

Lionel:

Do you think that since they were using Cushingism Vatican Council II was a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So there was known salvation outside the Church. Since there was known salvation outside the Church there are exceptions to an ecumenism of return, the need for the Social Reign of Christ the King and the need for all non Christians to formally convert into the Catholic Church.

Do you think that if they were using Feeneyism Vatican Council II was not a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There was noknown salvation outside the Church. Since there was no known salvation outside the Church there are no exceptions to an ecumenism of return, the need to teach the Social Reign of Christ the King and the need for all non Christians to formally convert into the Catholic Church.

_________________________________

Cardinal Ratzinger did not know that with Feeneyism Vatican Council II does not have a hermeneutic of rupture ?

Lionel:

For Cardinal Ratzinger the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries. He said this in the daily Avvenire.

So for him there are exceptions.

This is Cushingism.

In the theological paper of the International Theological Commission on 'Christianity and the World Religions' he says Pope Pius XII corrected the error of Fr.Leonard Feeney on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So for the ITC there are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So this is Cushingism.

-Lionel Andrades

Could you identify the irrational premise and conclusion for me ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/could-you-identify-irrational-premise.html


Do you agree that there can be an interpretation of Vatican Council II with or without an irrational premise and conclusion?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/do-you-agree-that-there-can-be.html

When an irrational premise is used I refer to it as Cushingism. When there is a rational premise, I refer to it as Feeneyism.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/when-irrational-premise-is-used-i-refer.html

https://gloria.tv/video/KGTNnspuhZyG6uMAzDyAv4vvJ